UK's "WAGatha Christie" soccer wives libel trial sees Vardy take the
stand
Send a link to a friend
[May 17, 2022] By
Michael Holden
LONDON (Reuters) -A libel trial pitting the wives of two former
England soccer strikers Wayne Rooney and Jamie Vardy saw Vardy's
wife Rebekah take the stand on Tuesday and deny accusations she had
leaked stories to the press about Rooney's wife Coleen.
Their battle, mixing glamour, amateur sleuthing and intimate
revelations has gripped the media and public.
Coleen Rooney, 36, is the wife of former England ace Wayne who holds
the record for the most international goals for his country, and
Rebekah Vardy's husband Jamie has also played and scored for the
national side
Vardy, 40, is suing her former friend for libel after Rooney accused
her of leaking stories about her after staging an elaborate sting
operation to find out who was passing on details of her private life
to the Sun tabloid.
The battle has been dubbed the "WAGatha Christie" case, a reference
to the "WAG" moniker given to the glamorous group of footballers'
wives and girlfriends and Rooney's detective work.
"I didn't leak anything," Vardy told London's High Court, on the
first day of the trial, having passed by Rooney and her husband to
reach the witness box. "I didn't give any information to a
newspaper."
The intrigue began almost three years ago when Rooney became
suspicious about stories appearing in the Sun involving information
about her from her personal Instagram account. She turned detective
to try to find out who the culprit was.
She said she blocked everyone from viewing her account except one
person and then posted a series of false stories to see whether they
leaked out, which she said they had.
She wrote on her social media accounts that only one person had
viewed the false stories, concluding with the revelation: "It's ...
Rebekah Vardy's account."
Facing questions from David Sherborne, Rooney's lawyer, Vardy agreed
leaking private, personal information was wrong. She was then
quizzed about a 2004 newspaper interview she had given in which she
detailed a sexual encounter with singer Peter Andre with derogatory
details about his genitalia.
"I was forced into doing something I didn't want to do," she told
the packed wood-panelled courtroom, blaming her ex-husband for
making her do the interview. "It was something that I was forced to
say."
[to top of second column] |
Coleen Rooney, wife of Derby County Manager Wayne Rooney, arrives at
the Royal Courts of Justice, in London, Britain, May 17, 2022.
REUTERS/Hannah McKay
'CAN WE LEAK A STORY?'
Sherborne also asked her about a message exchange she had with her
agent Caroline Watt in 2017 about photoshopped photos of an unnamed
friend to make her look thinner in which Vardy said: "Can we not
leak a story?"
Vardy told the court she "didn't mean it to say that" and she had
wanted to do a story about promoting positive body image.
Earlier Hugh Tomlinson, Vardy's lawyer, had said his client had
received abuse and threats online, after Rooney's post - constructed
he said like a "mini-whodunnit" - had been liked by 193,000 people
on Instagram and 300,000 on Twitter.
"She needs to be able to clear her name," Tomlinson said.
Sherborne argued Vardy had conducted a campaign of "deliberate
destruction of evidence" by deleting media files and WhatsApp
messages.
"Like any good detective story, you never find the person
responsible standing over the body with the smoking gun in her
hand," Sherborne said.
He suggested that Vardy had used her agent Watt as a "hitman" to
leak the stories on her behalf. Vardy has accepted that Watt might
be responsible, but denied any knowledge or authorising her to do
so, Tomlinson said.
"She accepts that it's possible that Ms Watt was the source," he
told the court.
In a plot twist of which Agatha Christie herself might have
approved, Watt's phone had ended up at the bottom of the North Sea
after she accidentally dropped it over the side of a boat.
The trial is due to last seven days with Rooney,
who will have to prove that her accusations are either substantially
true or in the public interest, and her husband due to give
evidence.
(Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky and Alexandra Hudson)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |