U.S. court revives 'insurrection' challenge to congressman Cawthorn
Send a link to a friend
[May 25, 2022] By
Jan Wolfe
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court
on Tuesday issued a decision that could bolster efforts to disqualify
members of Congress on the grounds that they voiced support for the Jan.
6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, saying a 150-year-old law does not
shield lawmakers from such challenges.
In a written ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived a
lawsuit alleging U.S. Representative Madison Cawthorn is unfit for
federal office.
The ruling will likely have little to no impact on Cawthorn because last
week he lost his re-election bid in North Carolina's Republican primary,
but the decision is likely to be cited as an important precedent in
future challenges.
The voters claimed Cawthorn voiced support for the violent Capitol
attack, violating a provision of the U.S. Constitution known as the
"Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause."
Cawthorn was one of only two members of Congress who spoke at
then-President Donald Trump's rally that preceded the Capitol rioting.
Cawthorn has vigorously denied that his actions and comments can be
equated with "insurrection" against the United States.
The Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause, passed after the
19th-century U.S. Civil War, bars politicians from running for Congress
if they have engaged in "insurrection or rebellion" against the United
States, or "given aid or comfort" to the nation's enemies.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina speaks at the
Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Orlando, Florida,
U.S. February 26, 2021. REUTERS/Octavio Jones/File Photo
The North Carolina voters are represented by Free
Speech For People, an advocacy group that brought a similar,
unsuccessful challenge to Republican U.S. Representative Marjorie
Taylor Greene's qualifications for office.
In that case, an administrative judge said challengers to Greene
failed to prove she was unfit for the office.
A federal judge in March dismissed the challenge to Cawthorn's
candidacy, saying the Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause was
effectively overridden by a law Congress passed in 1872 that granted
amnesty to Confederates who opposed the Union in the Civil War.
The 4th Circuit reversed that decision, concluding that the 1872 law
applied only to Civil War Confederates.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe in Washington; Editing by Noeleen Walder and
Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|