| 
		U.S. court revives 'insurrection' challenge to congressman Cawthorn
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [May 25, 2022] By 
		Jan Wolfe 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court 
		on Tuesday issued a decision that could bolster efforts to disqualify 
		members of Congress on the grounds that they voiced support for the Jan. 
		6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, saying a 150-year-old law does not 
		shield lawmakers from such challenges.
 
 In a written ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived a 
		lawsuit alleging U.S. Representative Madison Cawthorn is unfit for 
		federal office.
 
 The ruling will likely have little to no impact on Cawthorn because last 
		week he lost his re-election bid in North Carolina's Republican primary, 
		but the decision is likely to be cited as an important precedent in 
		future challenges.
 
 
		
		 
		The voters claimed Cawthorn voiced support for the violent Capitol 
		attack, violating a provision of the U.S. Constitution known as the 
		"Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause."
 
 Cawthorn was one of only two members of Congress who spoke at 
		then-President Donald Trump's rally that preceded the Capitol rioting. 
		Cawthorn has vigorously denied that his actions and comments can be 
		equated with "insurrection" against the United States.
 
 The Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause, passed after the 
		19th-century U.S. Civil War, bars politicians from running for Congress 
		if they have engaged in "insurrection or rebellion" against the United 
		States, or "given aid or comfort" to the nation's enemies.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina speaks at the 
			Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Orlando, Florida, 
			U.S. February 26, 2021. REUTERS/Octavio Jones/File Photo 
            
			
			
			 
            The North Carolina voters are represented by Free 
			Speech For People, an advocacy group that brought a similar, 
			unsuccessful challenge to Republican U.S. Representative Marjorie 
			Taylor Greene's qualifications for office.
 In that case, an administrative judge said challengers to Greene 
			failed to prove she was unfit for the office.
 
 A federal judge in March dismissed the challenge to Cawthorn's 
			candidacy, saying the Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause was 
			effectively overridden by a law Congress passed in 1872 that granted 
			amnesty to Confederates who opposed the Union in the Civil War.
 
 The 4th Circuit reversed that decision, concluding that the 1872 law 
			applied only to Civil War Confederates.
 
 (Reporting by Jan Wolfe in Washington; Editing by Noeleen Walder and 
			Jonathan Oatis)
 
            
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 
            
			
			 |