The ubiquitous fungal disease can cause 10 to 27% yield
loss, according to University of Illinois research. For many
farmers, the obvious response is to fight back with fungicide,
but a new U of I study shows Septoria can actually increase
after fungicide application.
“When we applied the fungicide, most of the fungi on plant
surfaces decreased. But a few went up, Septoria among them. It
was very surprising,” says Santiago Mideros, assistant professor
in the Department of Crop Sciences at U of I and study
co-author.
The study, led by former crop sciences doctoral student Heng-An
Lin, was designed to identify and track the soybean mycobiome –
the collection of fungi living on soybean plants – in real-world
field conditions. The researchers hoped to learn how Septoria
interacts with other plant-associated fungi and how fungicide
affects them all.
Lin and Mideros inoculated half the soybean seedlings in their
field trials with Septoria. Then, using genetic information and
sophisticated bioinformatics analyses, they identified fungal
species on leaves throughout the season, before and after
applying fungicide.
“We chose this particular fungicide, a mixture of fluxapyroxad
and pyraclostrobin, because it's quite commonly used nowadays in
the U.S. Midwest,” Mideros notes. “It's something we thought had
field relevance, according to current management practices in
soybean.”
The fungicide knocked back many fungi, but again, not Septoria.
Mideros thinks the fungicide removed Septoria’s competitors,
allowing the pathogen to flourish.
The surprising result calls into question the common practice of
yield-protective fungicide application.
“Based on previous research, we know when we spray a lot of
fungicide, like every week, the symptoms of Septoria are kept in
check and yield increases,” Mideros says. “But that application
frequency isn’t feasible for farmers. This study is a closer
approximation of what producers actually do, with one to three
applications during the season.
“I'm not saying fungicide wouldn't increase yield in some
fields. It might. But what I'm getting out of this study is that
we don't know exactly what we're doing when we apply fungicides
to protect yield. We need to learn a lot more about the
unintended effects of chemical applications. We could be doing
things more effectively if we had a better understanding of all
the changes to the systems when we do a fungicide application.”
[to top of second column] |
Although the jury’s still out on whether producers
should shelve the fungicide when battling Septoria, the study
provides an important look at how the soybean mycobiome interacts.
The researchers identified a total of 3,342 distinct fungi on the
three soybean lines they studied, some pathogenic, others
beneficial, and still more whose effects on soybeans haven’t been
characterized.
Knowing what fungi are on each soybean line and how
they interact could pave the way for future disease-fighting tools,
such as biocontrol agents.
“One of the things we were trying to address with this analysis was
to see which fungi are associated with each other. If we found
patterns where one fungus seemed to have a suppressive effect on
another, it could be used as a biocontrol agent. We did find some
negative associations, but not many, and unfortunately, none with
Septoria,” Mideros says. “But there are several organisms that have
a negative association with other fungi, so it's something we could
follow up on.
“There's a lot of interest in finding more sustainable management
practices, and it could come in the form of bio-fungicides or
manipulations of the mycobiome that could result in lower disease
and higher yields. There is a world of hidden microorganisms
associated with our crops we could tap into.”
The article, “The effect of Septoria glycines and fungicide
application on the soybean phyllosphere mycobiome,” is published in
Phytobiomes [DOI: 10.1094/PBIOMES-12-21-0075-R]. The research was
supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
The Department of Crop Sciences is in the College of Agricultural,
Consumer and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois
Urbana-Champaign.
[Source: Santiago Mideros,
News writer: Lauren Quinn] |