Amendment 1 could force changes to Illinois' SAFE-T Act police
regulations
Send a link to a friend
[November 29, 2022]
By Greg Bishop | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – Local governments in Illinois should brace for the
unknown with some expecting conflicts between the SAFE-T Act and a
looming constitutional amendment enshrining collective bargaining
rights.
Illinois state lawmakers are back in Springfield Tuesday for the final
three days of session before the SAFE-T Act’s no-cash bail law takes
effect Jan. 1.
When lawmakers were at the capitol the week before Thanksgiving, state
Sen. Robert Peters said they’ll bring about some “technical” changes to
the Pretrial Fairness Act, but didn’t elaborate.
“It’s similar to me, it’s like a family argument and we’ll get through
it, and the ideas, at the end of the day, all I hope for is that this
stays intact and it’s implemented in the intent that we saw when we
passed it,” Peters, D-Chicago, said.
The Pretrial Fairness Act was part of the SAFE-T Act the General
Assembly passed in early January 2021. State’s attorneys and sheriffs
across the state have a consolidated lawsuit challenging the measure’s
implementation. That’s expected to be heard in Kankakee County court
next week.
But, Illinois Policy Institute staff attorney Mailee Smith said other
provisions of the SAFE-T Act impacting law enforcement could be reversed
if the proposed amendment to the Illinois Constitution that prohibits
limits to collective bargaining is enacted.
[to top of second column]
|
Body camera footage from an on-duty
police officer.
Image courtesy of Police Activity's YouTube channel
“Amendment 1 could allow government union contracts, and that includes
police contracts, to override state laws and that includes portions of
the SAFE-T Act,” Smith told WMAY.
The proposed amendment codifying collective bargaining for a variety of
issues is projected to be approved with more than 50% of all votes cast
in the midterm general election earlier this month.
Some of the SAFE-T Act’s provisions that could be challenged with the
enshrined rights include the requirements for police-worn body cameras,
anonymous complaints against police or restrictions on the use of force
or deescalation techniques.
“Those police unions would have the ability to demand that there are
basically contrary provisions in their collective bargaining agreement
that would override state law like the SAFE-T Act,” Smith said.
Local governments should brace for unique challenges ahead, she said.
“No other state has done this and this opens our state and our
municipalities and our local government units up to having to negotiate
things that have never been tested before,” Smith said.
The final tally approving Amendment 1 is expected when the votes are
certified by the Illinois State Board of Elections next week.
Greg Bishop reports on Illinois government and other
issues for The Center Square. Bishop has years of award-winning
broadcast experience and hosts the WMAY Morning Newsfeed out of
Springfield. |