U.S. judge temporarily blocks two state lawsuits over J&J talc marketing
Send a link to a friend
[October 06, 2022]
By Dietrich Knauth and Brendan Pierson
(Reuters) -A U.S. bankruptcy judge has
blocked New Mexico and Mississippi from pursuing lawsuits accusing
Johnson & Johnson of misleading consumers about the safety of its talc
products, such as its baby powder, for now.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan in Trenton, New Jersey on Tuesday
said the litigation must be paused while an appellate court reviews
whether J&J can use the bankruptcy of subsidiary LTL Management to
resolve claims it is facing alleging that its talc products caused
cancer. He said he would revisit allowing the states' lawsuits to
proceed at a hearing in December.
J&J, which maintains its talc products are safe, created and spun off
LTL in October, assigned its talc liabilities to the unit and placed it
in bankruptcy a few days later.
That restructuring strategy, known as the "Texas two-step," paused about
38,000 individual lawsuits J&J was facing alleging that its baby powder
and other talc-based products contain trace amounts of asbestos and
caused mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.
"We disagree with Judge Kaplan's ruling and remain committed to ensuring
that those companies that have knowingly harmed consumers for decades do
not hide behind bankruptcy laws," New Mexico Attorney General Hector
Balderas said in a statement.
The office Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch and J&J did not
respond to requests for comment.
LTL sued New Mexico and Mississippi in July after learning that the
states intended to proceed with their lawsuits, despite the bankruptcy
court's order in February pausing other talc litigation.
[to top of second column]
|
A bottle of Johnson and Johnson Baby
Powder is seen in a photo illustration taken in New York, February
24, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar/Illustration/File Photo
New Mexico and Mississippi had
argued that the February order only blocked lawsuits by private
plaintiffs and that Kaplan does not have the authority to block
states from enforcing their consumer protection laws.
An ad hoc group of 41 states and the District of Columbia backed New
Mexico and Mississippi in a written brief. Unlike with the private
plaintiffs, allowing states to litigate would not risk opening the
doors to copycat lawsuits that could disrupt LTL's bankruptcy
restructuring, according to the states.
Attorneys representing private plaintiffs also supported the New
Mexico and Mississippi lawsuits, saying they could provide clarity
about the value of states' claims and aid in settlement
negotiations.
The private plaintiffs have asked the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss LTL's bankruptcy, saying that
LTL is a "concocted" corporation set up solely to stop them from
getting their day in court.
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth and Brendan Pierson, Editing by Alexia
Garamfalvi and Bill Berkrot)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|