Attorney general candidates clash over SAFE-T Act, public health
measures
Send a link to a friend
[October 12, 2022]
By PETER HANCOCK
Capitol News Illinois
phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – Attorney General Kwame Raoul
accused his Republican challenger Thomas DeVore of making “dangerous”
remarks, while DeVore accused the Democratic incumbent of failing the
state’s school students by not challenging Gov. JB Pritzker’s COVID-19
mitigations.
The charges and countercharges came during a nearly hourlong debate
organized by the Illinois Associated Press Media Editors and Capitol
News Illinois that was conducted Monday via Zoom.
Raoul, a former state senator from Chicago, is seeking his second term
in the AG’s office while DeVore, a southern Illinois attorney in private
practice, is trying to unseat him.
DeVore gained notoriety during the COVID-19 pandemic for filing numerous
lawsuits, mostly unsuccessful, challenging the governor’s authority to
issue multiple disaster declarations and to issue executive orders that
included mask mandates and other mitigation measures. Among his clients
in those suits was state Sen. Darren Bailey, who is now the GOP nominee
for governor.
“I think one of the things we've learned over the course of the last
couple of years is that there was a fair question to be asked about the
extent of the governor's ability to issue some of those mandates,”
DeVore said. “You know, you have some on one side of the conversation
say he could absolutely do it. You had some that said he absolutely
couldn't. But I think we would all agree as intellectual people there
was a fair question.”
Raoul, however, defended his decisions, and his support for Pritzker’s
executive orders, saying the state was in the midst of a deadly pandemic
and that he, himself, lost friends to the disease.
“I will agree with Mr. DeVore. It was a fair question to ask,” Raoul
said. “But how many times you ask it is a fair question too. It was
asked and answered multiple times in multiple lawsuits. And the courts’
resources should not have been abused as they were.”
The two also clashed over the role of the attorney general’s office in
prosecuting certain crimes, a decision that is traditionally left to
locally elected state’s attorneys.
In particular, DeVore has been an outspoken critic of Cook County
State’s Attorney Kimberly Foxx, arguing that she has refused to bring
charges in felony theft cases that involve less than $1,000. He even
said of Foxx at the Illinois State Fair, “she better get to prosecuting
or we'll find a way to prosecute her,” raising questions about whether
he would use the office to target his political opponents.
“It's a very broad statement, and she's not a political opponent of
mine,” DeVore said, adding that he believes people in Illinois “are
frustrated with elected officials arbitrarily making decisions that
don't make any sense to them.”
“Prosecutorial discretion is one thing,” he added. “But when you take
prosecutorial discretion to the point that you may be engaging in
official misconduct yourself by failing to perform a duty that the law
requires you to perform, that's at least a conversation that has to be
had, not just with Kim Foxx, but with other public officials.”
Later in the debate, Raoul responded to those comments, as well as other
comments he said DeVore has made suggesting he would investigate
political opponents.
“Those are dangerous statements, particularly in today's environment,”
Raoul said. “There have been prosecutors who have been prosecuted for
abusing their authority in political ways, and somebody who will overtly
make these statements as a candidate for attorney general should not be
let anywhere near the door of the attorney general's office.”
[to top of second column]
|
Attorney General Kwame Raoul and his
Republican challenger Thomas DeVore are pictured in a video debate
hosted Monday by the Illinois Associated Press Media Editors.
DeVore was also asked about the numerous private lawsuits he has
filed against individuals who have criticized him, including one
against Pritzker for calling him a “grifter” and one against
individuals, including a special education teacher, who criticized
him on Facebook after he referred to some students as “window
lickers.”
When asked if he would continue engaging in private litigation if he
is elected attorney general, Devore insisted he and all other
office-seekers have a right to defend themselves against false or
unfair accusations.
“So when it rises to the level of it's not just political talk, and
it's accusing people of committing crimes and saying other things
that impugn their ability to do their job, they have an absolute
right to defend themselves,” he said. “Me, the governor, Mr. Raoul
and anybody. And to suggest that it has some ulterior motive other
than defending your character, I take issue with that.”
Raoul responded that lawyers have a duty not to waste the courts’
resources and that lawyers can be sanctioned for filing
“nonmeritorious” lawsuits.
“First off, I don't think we want the courts to be used to stop
teachers from being protective of students when somebody's going to
do something that I think is just unconscionable,” he said. “The
other thing that's important to look at is the outcome of those
lawsuits. That lawsuit (against the teacher) was eventually
dismissed. Right?”
“You know, Attorney General Raoul, let me just say what you just
said on this camera is defamatory because you weren't there,” DeVore
fired back. “You don't know anything about it.”
The two candidates were also asked about their positions on the
SAFE-T Act, the sweeping criminal justice reform package that
lawmakers passed in 2021 that includes, among other things, the
elimination of cash bail beginning Jan. 1, 2023.
DeVore has been an outspoken critic of that law, arguing that he
believes it is unconstitutional and that the attorney general should
have challenged it in court.
“We now have over 50 state’s attorneys in the state of Illinois who
are now doing, for all intents and purposes, the attorney general's
job in bringing causes of action on numerous counts that it's
unconstitutional,” DeVore said. “It is in fact unconstitutional.”
Devore’s constitutional claims center on the law’s detainability
standards.
The law says the decision to detain someone in jail pending trial
will be based on factors other than the defendant’s ability to post
a cash bond, such as the severity of the crime, the defendant’s
likelihood of fleeing prosecution and whether they pose a risk to
other individuals or the community.
Raoul conceded that there are parts of the law that he thinks need
to be clarified, and he said lawmakers are in conversations about
that in advance of the upcoming veto session, which begins Nov. 15.
But he said one of the jobs of the attorney general is to defend the
laws of the state against constitutional challenges, and he would do
so for the SAFE-T Act.
“My obligation as a lawyer in general is towards justice,” Raoul
said. “And so if the evidence is such, or the law is such, that I
would have to concede unconstitutionality, I would have a
conversation with my client, and we'd have to do so. I don't believe
that's the case here.”
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government that is distributed to more
than 400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the
Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |