|
 When the Rev. Phalese Binion finally could afford
her own home in Park Ridge, Illinois, she least expected to potentially lose it
to high property taxes.
“When I purchased my home I didn’t understand the [tax] process until my first
tax bill came: over $13,000 on a $98,000 home,” Binion said.
“This is not the American Dream. This is the American nightmare.”
Binion was familiar with property tax issues from serving residents with housing
affordability problems and property tax appeals through the Westside Ministers
Coalition. Following the rules didn’t lead to relief for those she served, or
for herself.
“Community members would come into our office every day saying that the taxes
were too high, and they were losing their homes,” she said. “I didn’t understand
the process when I first started because I wasn’t a homeowner.”
“But, even then, I still understood that people were supposed to come in if
there was an error and fill out the forms to correct the assessment. And still,
I wasn’t seeing a whole lot of changes. [When I got my tax bill] I didn’t know
what to do or who to go to. I tried implementing different exemptions that I
could qualify for, but my property taxes are still too high.”
And property taxes are set to rise even faster should Amendment 1, otherwise
known as the “Workers Rights Amendment,” pass on Nov. 8.
That first question on the ballot will ask Illinois voters about a “Proposed
Amendment to the 1970 Illinois Constitution.” That’s Amendment 1.
Amendment 1 would insert four clauses into the Illinois Constitution that
promise:
Likely guarantee tax hikes, including at least a $2,149 property tax hike on
average per family over four years.
Grant government union bosses more power than those in any other state.
Give those bosses enough power to prevent voters and lawmakers from reforming
bad public policy, including fixing Illinois’ pension debt.
Potentially overturn more than 350 existing Illinois laws.
Illinoisans already pay the second-highest property taxes in the nation. High
property taxes are a major reason taxpayers are fleeing to lower-tax states.
“Politicians say they’re advocating on behalf of families and that they want
people to access homeownership, but then their constituents lose their homes.
The owners of the house next to me and the house catty-corner across the street
from me just walked away from them. The owner of the house across the street
only fixed it up because he’s trying to sell it,” she said.
[to top of second column] |
“My tax bill has gone down. It’s the lowest it has ever been, which is over
$6,000 per year, but it is still incredibly high,” Binion said. “When I have
vacancies on both sides of me and across the street, what am I really getting
for my $500 a month in property taxes?”
Amendment 1 promises to increase this burden by expanding the scope of
government union bargaining to virtually any topic. As the list of demands
grows, Illinois taxpayers would be tasked with footing the bill for the higher
costs of both new benefits and longer negotiations. States with more powerful
government unions have both higher property tax rates and greater debt burdens.
“The commercial they have for the ‘Workers’ Rights Amendment’ is very
misleading. They do not share that it only applies to government workers. On top
of that, if you have harmful employees, what happens if they want to take away
background checks for schools or in the medical field? Who is protecting
students or patients? This amendment would allow them to undo those
protections,” Binion said.
Government union workers, which make up 7% of the population in Illinois,
already have some of the strongest rights in the nation. Rejecting Amendment 1
would not change their protected rights.
“People are losing their homes to taxes, and that’s just ridiculous. Amending
the state constitution for the ‘Workers’ Rights Amendment’ will only make things
worse. I am a former union member myself, and there are laws in place to protect
union workers anyway, so who is this amendment really going to help?” she said.
“It is my heartfelt belief as a taxpayer, a former union worker and a homeowner
that voting ‘no’ on this amendment won’t hurt unionized workers.”
Amendment 1’s language also bans voters or lawmakers from ever being able to
implement changes. Rejecting Amendment 1 would protect taxpayers and lawmaker
powers to fix bad policy and pass common-sense reforms to fix rising property
taxes such as “hold-harmless” pension reform.
There’s still a chance to again turn homeownership in Illinois into the American
Dream. Voters have a historic chance to reject a property tax hike Nov. 8.
“There has to be a change,” Binion said. “And the only thing we can do is vote.”
|
