| 
		U.S. jury acquits Russian on charges he lied to FBI over 'Steele 
		dossier'
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [October 19, 2022]  
		By Sarah N. Lynch 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A Russian researcher 
		who contributed explosive details to a document dubbed the "Steele 
		dossier" that alleged ties between former U.S. President Donald Trump's 
		2016 election campaign and Russia was acquitted by a jury on Tuesday on 
		charges that he lied to the FBI about the sources of his information.
 
 Igor Danchenko's acquittal in federal court in Washington dealt another 
		blow to Special Counsel John Durham, who was appointed in 2019 by 
		Trump-era Attorney General William Barr to investigate the FBI's 
		"Crossfire Hurricane" probe into whether members of Trump's campaign had 
		colluded with Russia.
 
 Jurors acquitted Danchenko on four charges. The judge in the case 
		earlier had thrown out a fifth charge.
 
 "While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury's 
		decision and thank them for their service," Durham said in a statement.
 
 In another trial of a defendant charged by Durham, a jury in Washington 
		in May acquitted Michael Sussmann, an attorney for Democrat Hillary 
		Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, of charges that he lied to the FBI 
		when he passed along a later-discredited tip about possible 
		communications between Trump's business and a Russian bank.
 
 
		
		 
		Danchenko, a Russian-born researcher who resides in Northern Virginia, 
		was indicted by Durham's office in 2021 on five counts of making false 
		statements to FBI agents in 2017 about the sources of information he 
		provided to former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.
 
 His attorneys argued that the indictment was baseless, saying their 
		client's answers to the FBI's often "ambiguous" questions were 
		"literally" true and not material.
 
 For instance, Danchenko was accused of misleading the FBI by claiming he 
		never "talked" to Charles Dolan, a Democratic operative and public 
		relations executive, about anything in the Steele dossier, when in fact 
		they had communicated in writing.
 
 U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga said last week he agreed with the 
		defense, and he dismissed one of the five charges against Danchenko 
		related to his communications with Dolan.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            An FBI logo is pictured on an agent's 
			shirt in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S. 
			October 19, 2021. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri 
            
			
			
			 
            The judge allowed the other four charges to be decided by the jury. 
			Those charges accused Danchenko of lying to the FBI by claiming he 
			had spoken to Sergei Millian, the former president of the 
			Russian-American Chamber of Commerce, to gather information later 
			used in the dossier.
 Danchenko's lawyers maintained their client received an anonymous 
			call from a person who Danchenko suspected was Millian, but he told 
			agents he was not certain it was him.
 
 Steele was hired by a U.S.-based research firm called Fusion GPS, 
			which in turn was retained by Sussmann's law firm on behalf of 
			Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee to dig up 
			dirt on Trump. The dossier contained salacious details about Trump, 
			many of which have never been substantiated.
 
 Trenga placed strict limits on what Durham's team could present as 
			evidence to the jury, including ruling that the scandalous 
			allegations about "Donald Trump's alleged sexual activity" in a 
			Moscow hotel were off limits, finding they were not direct evidence 
			and their relevancy was questionable.
 
 An investigation by the Justice Department's inspector general later 
			found that the FBI improperly continued to rely on unsubstantiated 
			allegations in the Steele dossier when it applied for court-approved 
			warrant applications to monitor the communications of Carter Page, a 
			former Trump campaign adviser.
 
 A former FBI attorney, Kevin Clinesmith, was later prosecuted by 
			Durham and pleaded guilty to falsifying a document used in the law 
			enforcement agency's warrant applications.
 
 Another special counsel, Robert Mueller, conducted an investigation 
			that documented contacts between Trump's campaign and Russians, but 
			his final report concluded there was not enough evidence to 
			establish that the campaign had engaged in a criminal conspiracy 
			with Moscow.
 
 (Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Will Dunham, Scott Malone 
			and Tim Ahmann)
 
            
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 
            
			
			 |