Analysis-U.S. Republicans aim at Ukraine aid but unlikely to block it
Send a link to a friend
[October 21, 2022]
By Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Republicans
will have the power to block aid to Ukraine if they win back control of
Congress, but they are more likely to slow or pare back the flow of
defense and economic assistance than stop it, analysts said.
They might also use support for the Ukrainian war effort as leverage to
force Democrats to back Republican priorities such as clamping down on
immigration across the southern border with Mexico.
Democrats have been raising the possibility Republicans would curb
assistance to Kyiv for months, given polls showing the party likely to
end the Democrats' narrow control of the House of Representatives, if
not the Senate, in the Nov. 8 midterm elections. Europeans bearing the
brunt of the war's impact have also voiced concern.
President Joe Biden said on Thursday during a visit to Pennsylvania - a
state with close congressional races - that he was worried about the
Republican stance on aid to Ukraine.
There has been more Republican opposition in the House, where the caucus
is more closely allied than in the Senate with former President Donald
Trump and his "America First" policies. All 57 House votes against a
bill providing more than $40 billion for Ukraine in May came from
Republicans.
"You've got big pockets of the Republican party that have very kind of
isolationist views," said Scott Anderson, a governance expert at the
Brookings Institution.
However, Anderson and other analysts said there remains widespread
bipartisan support for Ukraine eight months after Russia's invasion and
that is unlikely to change soon, especially if Ukrainian forces continue
a recent series of battlefield advances.
Anderson said some Republicans have viewed Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelenskiy's administration as corrupt since Trump's first impeachment
trial.
House Democrats voted to impeach Trump in 2019 on charges he held up
military aid for Kyiv to put pressure on Zelenskiy to investigate one of
Biden's sons. The issue could loom large again for Trump's closest House
allies, especially if he becomes the Republican presidential nominee in
2024.
"They're a minority element (but) that doesn't mean they won't wield
potentially outsized influence in the Republican caucus," Anderson said.
Trump's vice president, Mike Pence, chided Republicans who have
questioned supporting Ukraine, condemning what he termed "apologists"
for Russian President Vladimir Putin and warning against "unprincipled
populism" during a speech on Wednesday at the conservative Heritage
Foundation.
Conservative U.S. television personalities who wield a major influence
over the Republican base have also inveighed against assistance approved
for Kyiv, which totals about $66 billion so far including military,
economic and humanitarian support.
"It is certainly a question that looms large over Capitol Hill at the
moment," said Brett Bruen, who was director of global engagement in
President Barack Obama's White House.
[to top of second column]
|
A man walks past a shop damaged by an
explosion, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Mykolaiv, Ukraine
October 20, 2022. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko/File Photo
NO 'BLANK CHECK'
Concern about a Republican-led shift in policy on Kyiv was amplified
this week when Representative Kevin McCarthy, the top House
Republican and likely next Speaker, said there would be no "blank
check" for Ukraine if Republicans take over.
"I think people are going to be sitting in a recession and they're
not going to write a blank check to Ukraine," McCarthy told
Punchbowl News. "And then there's the things [the Biden
administration] is not doing domestically. Not doing the border and
people begin to weigh that."
In an appearance on Bloomberg Television, Representative Michael
McCaul, the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee,
said some in his party are concerned about the cost of the Ukraine
effort but not the goal, and he pledged "more oversight and
accountability" if Republicans win the majority.
Biden administration officials have said they will support Ukraine's
fight against Russia for as long as necessary.
Mark Cancian, a defense expert at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, said the total U.S. price tag for the Ukraine
war is relatively small, given the Pentagon's $800 billion annual
budget and the importance of supporting democracy and stability in
Europe.
"Many strategists - and I would put myself among them - would say
this is a reasonable amount of money and it's cost-effective," he
said, noting the price would be much higher if U.S. troops were
doing the fighting.
Several defense industry executives said they viewed the Republican
comments on Ukraine aid as political rhetoric ahead of the midterms,
not a threat.
Shares of companies including Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics
Corp., L3Harris Technologies, Raytheon Technologies and Northrop
Grumman have outperformed major stock market indexes so far this
year.
Polls have Americans backing the aid. A Reuters/Ipsos opinion survey
this month showed 73% of Americans felt the United States should
continue to support Kyiv. There was more support among Biden's
fellow Democrats - 81% - than Republicans - 66%.
The possibility of less U.S. military assistance has prompted
jitters in Ukraine itself and elsewhere in Europe.
"It's the war of the free world, and rules-based world against the
aggressor and this is exactly how we have to take it," Estonian
Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur told reporters this week after meeting
with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
"When anyone, doesn't matter whether it's Republican or Democrat,
says that we don't care about the rules-based world, then we can say
that we stop helping Ukraine," Pevkur said.
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Additional reporting by Humeyra
Pamuk and Mike Stone; Editing by Mary Milliken and Daniel Wallis)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |