Exclusive-Tesla faces U.S. criminal probe over self-driving
claims-sources
Send a link to a friend
[October 27, 2022] By
Mike Spector and Dan Levine
Tesla Inc is under criminal investigation
in the United States over claims that the company's electric vehicles
can drive themselves, three people familiar with the matter said.
The U.S. Department of Justice launched the previously undisclosed probe
last year following more than a dozen crashes, some of them fatal,
involving Tesla’s driver assistance system Autopilot, which was
activated during the accidents, the people said.
As early as 2016, Tesla’s marketing materials have touted Autopilot’s
capabilities. On a conference call that year, Elon Musk, the Silicon
Valley automaker’s chief executive, described it as “probably better”
than a human driver.
Last week, Musk said on another call Tesla would soon release an
upgraded version of “Full Self-Driving” software allowing customers to
travel “to your work, your friend’s house, to the grocery store without
you touching the wheel.”
A video currently on the company’s website says: “The person in the
driver’s seat is only there for legal reasons. He is not doing anything.
The car is driving itself.”
However, the company also has explicitly warned drivers that they must
keep their hands on the wheel and maintain control of their vehicles
while using Autopilot.
The Tesla technology is designed to assist with steering, braking, speed
and lane changes but its features “do not make the vehicle autonomous,”
the company says on its website.
Such warnings could complicate any case the Justice Department might
wish to bring, the sources said.
Tesla, which disbanded its media relations department in 2020, did not
respond to written questions from Reuters on Wednesday. Musk also did
not respond to written questions seeking comment. A Justice Department
spokesperson declined to comment.
Musk said in an interview with Automotive News in 2020 that Autopilot
problems stem from customers using the system in ways contrary to
Tesla’s instructions.
Federal and California safety regulators are already scrutinizing
whether claims about Autopilot's capabilities and the system's design
imbue customers with a false sense of security, inducing them to treat
Teslas as truly driverless cars and become complacent behind the wheel
with potentially deadly consequences.
The Justice Department investigation potentially represents a more
serious level of scrutiny because of the possibility of criminal charges
against the company or individual executives, the people familiar with
the inquiry said.
As part of the latest probe, Justice Department prosecutors in
Washington and San Francisco are examining whether Tesla misled
consumers, investors and regulators by making unsupported claims about
its driver assistance technology's capabilities, the sources said.
Officials conducting their inquiry could ultimately pursue criminal
charges, seek civil sanctions or close the probe without taking any
action, they said.
[to top of second column] |
The interior of a Tesla Model S is shown
in autopilot mode in San Francisco, California, U.S., April 7, 2016.
REUTERS/Alexandria Sage
The Justice Department’s Autopilot probe is far from recommending
any action partly because it is competing with two other DOJ
investigations involving Tesla, one of the sources said.
Investigators still have much work to do and no decision on charges
is imminent, this source said.
The Justice Department may also face challenges in building its
case, said the sources, because of Tesla’s warnings about
overreliance on Autopilot.
For instance, after telling the investor call last week that Teslas
would soon travel without customers touching controls, Musk added
that the vehicles still needed someone in the driver’s seat. “Like
we’re not saying that that’s quite ready to have no one behind the
wheel,” he said.
The Tesla website also cautions that, before enabling Autopilot, the
driver first needs to agree to "keep your hands on the steering
wheel at all times" and to always "maintain control and
responsibility for your vehicle.”
Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney in Detroit who prosecuted
automotive companies and employees in fraud cases and is not
involved in the current probe, said investigators likely would need
to uncover evidence such as emails or other internal communications
showing that Tesla and Musk made misleading statements about
Autopilot’s capabilities on purpose.
SEVERAL PROBES
The criminal Autopilot investigation adds to the other probes and
legal issues involving Musk, who became locked in a court battle
earlier this year after abandoning a $44 billion takeover of social
media giant Twitter Inc, only to reverse course and proclaim
excitement for the looming acquisition.
In August 2021, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration opened an investigation into a series of crashes, one
of them fatal, involving Teslas equipped with Autopilot slamming
into parked emergency vehicles.
NHTSA officials in June intensified their probe, which covers
830,000 Teslas with Autopilot, identifying 16 crashes involving the
company’s electric cars and stationary first-responder and road
maintenance vehicles. The move is a step that regulators must take
before requesting a recall. The agency had no immediate comment.
In July this year, the California Department of Motor Vehicles
accused Tesla of falsely advertising its Autopilot and Full
Self-Driving capability as providing autonomous vehicle control.
Tesla filed paperwork with the agency seeking a hearing on the
allegations and indicated it intends to defend against them. The DMV
said in a statement it is currently in the discovery stage of the
proceeding and declined further comment.
(Additional reporting by Hyunjoo Jin and David Shepardson; Editing
by Deepa Babington)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |