Barrack says he hoped Trump ties would appeal to UAE; denies being agent
Send a link to a friend
[October 28, 2022]
By Luc Cohen
NEW YORK (Reuters) -Tom Barrack, a onetime
fundraiser for Donald Trump, acknowledged under cross-examination on
Thursday that he hoped his ties to the then-president would encourage a
United Arab Emirates official to invest with his company, but said he
did not agree to exchange political access for a business relationship.
Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn say Barrack, 75, used his influence with
Trump's campaign and administration in 2016 and 2017 to promote the
United Arab Emirates' interests without informing the U.S. attorney
general he was acting as an agent of the country, as required by law.
Barrack has pleaded not guilty, and argues his interactions with Middle
Eastern officials were part of his role running private equity firm
Colony Capital, now known as DigitalBridge Group Inc. He began
testifying in his own defense on Monday, denying that he agreed to act
at the UAE's direction.
During cross-examination on Thursday, prosecutor Sam Nitze asked Barrack
whether he was hoping his ties to Trump could set him apart in his quest
to seek investment from Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a national
security official in the UAE who also ran a bank, when the two met in
the Emirates in May 2016.
"You can't be just another deal guy, right, showing up with your
briefcase and your PowerPoint deck," Nitze said. "Yes or no, one of the
things you wanted to offer Sheikh Tahnoun was your access to Donald
Trump?"
Barrack responded affirmatively to both questions. But when asked by
Nitze if he agreed to get Sheikh Tahnoun access and influence "in the
hopes of securing a long-term business relationship," Barrack replied,
"No."
Prosecutors have pointed to investments by two Emirati sovereign wealth
funds in Colony projects in 2017 and 2018 as evidence of Barrack's
motivation to work as an agent.
Under direct examination by his lawyer Michael Schachter earlier on
Thursday, Barrack testified he had little involvement with the deals,
which totaled $374 million. He said one of the funds, Mubadala, almost
pulled out of one of the deals after learning there would be an Israeli
co-investor.
[to top of second column]
|
Defendants Tom Barrack and Matthew
Grimes listen to the prosecutor during opening arguments in a
courtroom sketch in New York City, U.S. September 21, 2022.
REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg/File Photo
"If Mubadala was investing as a favor to you in exchange for acting
as a UAE agent, would you expect them to threaten to pull out?"
Schachter said
"Probably not," Barrack replied.
Mubadala did not immediately respond to a request for comment
outside Emirati business hours.
KHASHOGGI MURDER
Under questioning by Schachter, Barrack said he urged the
then-president to use the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi
as a "lever" to get Saudi Arabia to end a blockade on Qatar that
began in 2017.
The testimony from Barrack that he pushed for Qatar's interests
could undermine the charges he acted at the UAE's behest. Barrack is
not charged with acting as a Saudi agent, but the country is close
with the UAE, which implemented the blockade alongside Saudi Arabia,
Bahrain and others.
He said that during an October 2018 phone call with Trump -following
Khashoggi's murder in Saudi Arabia's consulate in Turkey - he urged
the then-president to use global outrage over the killing "as a
lever over this idiotic blockade."
U.S. intelligence says the murder of Khashoggi, a Saudi
insider-turned-critic, was approved by Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman, the de facto ruler. The prince has denied ordering the
killing but acknowledged it took place "under my watch."
(Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis and
Noeleen Walder)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|