Chile's constitution vote puts Andean country at historic crossroads
Send a link to a friend
[September 02, 2022]
By Natalia A. Ramos Miranda and Alexander Villegas
SANTIAGO (Reuters) - Chileans are set for a
historic decision on Sunday: stick with a market-friendly constitution
dating back to military dictator Augusto Pinochet or approve a
progressive new text that promises to shake up the Andean country's
political and social fabric.
The copper-rich country is sharply divided, with polls indicating that
the new text will get rejected, despite huge popular support for tearing
up the Pinochet-era constitution two years ago in the wake of months of
fiery protests against inequality.
The vote is a crossroads for Chile, long seen as a bastion of
conservatism and market-orientated economic policy, which underpinned
decades of growth and stability that also created stark inequality
between rich and poor.
"This is about settling a historical debt in Chile, because despite
economic growth and lower poverty, we have outstanding debts to do with
inequality and social welfare," said Vlado Mirosevic, spokesperson for
the approve campaign.
Mirosevic said the new constitution was key to overturning decades of
inequality and put progressive rights and the environment at the heart
of the country's social fabric.
Nearly 80% of Chileans voted to draft a new constitution in October
2020. An elected 155-member assembly, consisting of mostly independent
and progressive constituents, then began drafting it the following May,
completing it earlier this year.
But enthusiasm has waned as Chile's economy has felt the impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic, spiraling inflation and the currency hitting historic
lows. That's hurt support for the constitution and its backer,
progressive President Gabriel Boric.
Polls indicate the reject camp holding a near 10 percentage point lead
of around 46% to 37%, according to the most recent surveys. Some 17%
remain undecided.
Ximena Rincon, a conservative senator campaigning against the new
constitution, said people had lost faith in the assembly responsible for
drafting the text. Lots of uncertainty and disinformation has bogged
down the constitution also.
"The assembly wasn't representative of society," she said, calling for a
smaller, more representative assembly to be elected if the new
constitution was rejected on Sunday.
[to top of second column]
|
Supporters of the "I Reject" option
attend the closing campaign rally ahead of a constitutional
referendum, in Santiago, Chile September 1, 2022. REUTERS/Ailen Diaz
'I VOTE NO'
Kenneth Bunker, a political analyst, said Sunday's vote might also
act as a referendum on Boric, a young former student protest leader
who took office in March and has supported the new constitution.
"There will be people who see the price of gasoline and food, and
blame the government over the economy and say that they're the same
ones who made the constitution, and so decide 'I vote no'," Bunker
said.
Unpredictability remains, however, given the number of undecided
voters and a mandatory vote as opposed to previous elections where
voting was voluntary.
"That's probably the biggest uncertainty, a lot of people like to
extrapolate results from polls," said Rossana Castiglioni, a
professor of political science at Diego Portales University.
"But the truth is we know relatively little from this 50%, from this
half of the population that abstains from electoral processes."
Boric has said he would launch a new process to draft another
constitution if the current one fails on Sunday, while other
political factions want to amend the current text. Regardless of the
result, experts say Chileans still want the change that they
clamored for in 2019-2020.
"People are still waiting for the social agenda that was outlined
after the (2019) social uprising, a trend that brought Boric to the
presidency," said Axel Callis, a political analyst for pollster
TuInfluyes, adding protest anger could be reignited.
"If this doesn't lead to deep changes in terms of social rights,
health and pensions, then we're going to be left with an explosive
atmosphere."
(Reporting by Alexander Villegas and Natalia Ramos; Editing by
Alistair Bell)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|