Finding special master in Trump classified documents case no easy task
Send a link to a friend
[September 08, 2022]
By Sarah N. Lynch, Jacqueline Thomsen and Karen Freifeld
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge has
given the U.S. Justice Department and Donald Trump's lawyers until
Friday to come up with a list of potential candidates to serve as a
special master to review records the FBI seized from the former
president's Florida estate.
But finding people who have the necessary experience and security
clearances to handle the highly classified documents -- and the
willingness to enter the political brushfire surrounding the probe --
will be no small task, legal experts said.
"If we're talking about highly classified material, there's only a
relatively small number of individuals who would satisfy the
requirements of the job," said attorney Kenneth Feinberg, who served as
a special master for the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund.
"It would have to be somebody willing to take on the hurricane. It's not
purely a security issue. It's become a political issue," he said.
One illustration of the challenge: the nonprofit law firm National
Security Counselors last week provided the court with a list of four
potential candidates with expertise on executive privilege. All four
have since made public comments that either suggest they don't want the
job or that could be used to argue against them by lawyers for the
Justice Department or Trump.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday ruled that a special master
should review the records seized from Trump's Palm Beach home to weed
out anything that should be kept from prosecutors, either due to
attorney-client privilege or executive privilege - a legal doctrine that
shields some White House communications from disclosure.
The U.S. Supreme Court last year side-stepped the question of how far a
former president's privilege claims can go in rejecting Trump's bid to
keep White House records from the Jan. 6 select committee.
However, the U.S. National Archives, after conferring with the Justice
Department, told Trump's lawyers earlier this year that he cannot assert
privilege against the executive branch to shield the records from the
FBI.
SPECIAL MASTER
A special master is an independent outside expert who is sometimes
tapped to review records seized by the government in sensitive cases
where some of the material might be privileged.
Whoever is picked will likely need to have a top-level security
clearance because more than 100 of the 11,000-plus documents are marked
as top secret, secret or confidential.
A special master has never before been called on to determine whether
records are covered by executive privilege, particularly in the unique
circumstance of a former president asserting the right over the
prerogative of the current president, Joe Biden.
"Appointing a special master I think may be harder than people think,"
said John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser who
previously also served at the Justice Department. "How many people with
TS/SCI clearance are out there? And how many of them are experts on
executive privilege?"
[to top of second column]
|
An aerial view of former U.S. President
Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home after Trump said that FBI agents
raided it, in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S. August 15, 2022.
REUTERS/Marco Bello/File Photo
SOME OPT OUT
None of the four potential candidates identified by National
Security Counselors in a court filing last week have openly embraced
the idea.
One of them, Mark Rozell, the dean of the public policy school at
George Mason University, has asked for his name to be removed from
the list, telling Reuters: "Flattered that someone thinks I’m
qualified, but I prefer analyzing from the outside of events."
A second, former Justice Department attorney Jonathan Shaub, has not
said whether he would take the job, but criticized Cannon's order in
an interview with Reuters on Monday, saying it was "filled with
inaccuracies about the law" and that the judge seemed to be "bending
over backwards to help Trump."
Northwestern University law professor Heidi Kitrosser, the third,
told Reuters that she believes she is unlikely to be selected, after
some conservative media outlets and Trump supporters on social media
pointed to her prior political comments.
The fourth person, Mitchel Sollenberger of the University of
Michigan-Dearborn, said he does not have a security clearance.
A Justice Department spokesman on Monday said the government is
reviewing Cannon's order without commenting on next steps. Attorneys
for Trump did not respond to requests for comment.
Most prior cases involving special masters related to practicing
attorneys who had a duty to keep their clients' records
confidential.
A special master was appointed, for instance, after the FBI searched
the homes and offices of former Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and
Michael Cohen.
Some legal experts said the best bet is to look for recently retired
judges from Washington, D.C., or Florida who have handled national
security cases and could easily get their clearance restored.
Robert Costello, an attorney for Giuliani, said that after the FBI
seized items from his client's home and office, the government and
the defense team were able to quickly agree on a special master
candidate: retired judge Barbara Jones.
"They will try to whittle it down to one," he said, noting that they
will look for someone who can be "neutral and fair."
If they can't agree, he said, the judge can pick someone herself.
"The judge would be wise to make sure that it's a consensus
candidate," said Feinberg. "She may end up appointing somebody over
the objection of one side or the other, but at least she's made an
effort to determine and calibrate the degree of opposition."
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Jacqueline Thomsen in Washington
and Karen Freifeld in New York; Editing by Scott Malone and Mark
Porter)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |