Explainer-Republicans push to restrict mail-in voting ahead of U.S.
November midterms
Send a link to a friend
[September 09, 2022]
By Julia Harte
(Reuters) - The Republican Party has pushed
to enact new curbs on mail-in voting, which surged in the 2020
presidential election and fueled former President Donald Trump's false
claims that he was robbed of victory by widespread voter fraud.
Citing security concerns, 18 states passed new legal limits on mail-in
voting in the months after the election, from extra identification
requirements to shortening the window in which mail ballots can be
requested or cast.
Mail-in voting is unlikely to be used as heavily in November’s
congressional election as it was in 2020 during the height of the
COVID-19 pandemic, but voting rights advocates warn the new restrictions
could disenfranchise voters.
THE 2020 MAIL-IN VOTING DEBATE
As the COVID-19 pandemic surged across the country in 2020, prompting
Americans to avoid public spaces, many states expanded mail-in voting to
accommodate the increasing demand. Trump attacked the method as
insecure, tweeting in May 2020 that mail-in ballots would “lead to
massive corruption and fraud.”
It took four days for media outlets to declare President Joe Biden the
winner, due in part to some states continuing to accept mail-in ballots
for days after Election Day, so long as they were postmarked by that
date.
Citing that delay as proof that vote tampering was afoot, Trump falsely
declared victory hours after Election Day, claiming the millions of
mail-in votes still being counted were fraudulent.
WHO DOES MAIL-IN VOTING BENEFIT?
Democrats represented a far greater share of mail-in voters in the 2020
presidential election than Republicans, thanks in part to Trump’s
insistence to his base that it was insecure.
But multiple studies have found that higher mail-in voting participation
generally does not appear to turn out more Democratic voters than
Republican ones, nor does it improve the odds of a Democratic candidate
winning an election.
In Texas, for instance, the rise in Democratic voters who voted by mail
in the 2020 election was offset by the smaller portion of Democrats who
voted in person, according to a study in Science magazine published last
December.
Although all scientifically sound studies found virtually no fraud in
the 2020 election, mail-in voting does carry increased risks for vote
tampering, simply because the ballot has to travel a longer distance
between the voter and the election office, according to University of
Chicago public policy professor Anthony Fowler.
The most secure method for avoiding election interference, according to
Fowler, is voting in person on paper ballots that are kept in a lockbox
until being counted. But there are “trade-offs,” he said, because it is
also important to enfranchise voters who can’t easily get to polling
places, such as people who lack reliable transportation, the elderly or
infirm, and residents of rural areas.
[to top of second column]
|
A worker removes mail-in ballots from envelopes at the Sacramento
Registrar of Voters in Sacramento, California, U.S., September 14,
2021. REUTERS/Fred Greaves
CHANGES TO MAIL-IN VOTING LAWS
In the name of improving election security, 18 states, mostly with
Republican-controlled legislatures, passed laws after the 2020
election that curtailed access to mail-in voting, while 22 states
expanded it, according to the Brennan Center for Justice and Voting
Rights Lab.
Some legislation contained both expansions and restrictions, such as
an Indiana law that limited the use of boxes where voters could drop
their absentee ballots, but also made it easier to return a ballot
on behalf of another voter and to fix mistakes on absentee ballots.
The most dramatic fallout from new mail-in voting restrictions has
been in Texas. A law passed in 2021 requires election workers to
automatically reject mail-in ballots or applications if the voter
uses a different ID number than what they provided when registering
to vote.
The mail ballot rejection rate in Texas’ March primary was one in
eight, or 12.4%, according to data from the secretary of state’s
office, compared to Texas’ 0.8% mail ballot rejection rate during
the 2020 election. Officials blamed the spike in rejected ballots
mostly on the new law.
In subsequent, much smaller elections in Texas, the rejection rate
fell to less than 4%, which the law’s defenders said proved that
voters had adjusted to the new requirement. But voter advocates say
those elections’ turnout was too small to prove the problem was
fixed.
WHAT TO EXPECT IN THE 2022 MIDTERMS
With many Americans returning to normal life despite the ongoing
coronavirus pandemic, public policy experts such as Fowler believe
there will be less demand for mail-in voting in November than there
was in the 2020 election. There has also been less criticism of
mail-in voting this year, compared to 2020.
But voting rights advocates fear that new restrictions could
disproportionately hinder voters of color, such as a 2021 Georgia
law shortening the time to apply for and cast mail ballots.
Although turnout in Georgia’s June primary was nearly triple that of
the 2018 midterm primaries, Brennan Center analysts found that the
turnout gap between white and Black voters had also widened to 6
percentage points, the highest disparity in a decade.
(Reporting by Julia Harte, editing by Ross Colvin and Alistair Bell)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|