Analysis-Europe says goodbye to negative rates - or just 'au revoir'?
Send a link to a friend
[September 22, 2022] By
Mark John and Dhara Ranasinghe
LONDON (Reuters) - Europe's decade-long
experiment with negative interest rates, which ended on Thursday with
the Swiss National Bank's return to positive territory, showed one
thing: they can exist beyond the realms of economic science fiction.
Launched to revive economies after the 2007/08 financial crisis, the
policy flipped standard money wisdom on its head: banks had to pay a fee
to park cash with their central banks; some home-owners found mortgages
that paid them interest; and rewards for the act of saving all but
vanished.
With the exercise now abandoned in the face of galloping inflation
brought on by pandemic and the Ukraine war, doubts linger over its
effectiveness and under what circumstances it will ever be used again.
"I think that probably the bar is going to be higher in the future,"
said Claudio Borio, head of the Monetary and Economic Department of the
Basel-based Bank of International Settlements which acts as bank to the
world's central banks.
Rarely does monetary policy generate as much sound and fury as did the
recourse in the early 2010s to negative rates by four European central
banks and the Bank of Japan - now the only monetary authority still
sticking with them.
With interest rates back then already close to zero, they had run out of
conventional ammunition to ward off the threat of outright deflation
they feared would choke off the economic recovery. The only way out,
they decided, was to go below zero.
Bank chiefs fumed as the European Central Bank, Swedish Riksbank, Swiss
National Bank (SNB) and Denmark's Nationalbank went negative in moves
they said undermined the whole banking business model of being able to
make a profit out of lending.
Local media joined in the criticism, with Swiss newspapers in 2015
calling the moment "Frankenshock" and Germany's Bild labelling the then
ECB chief Mario Draghi "Count Draghila" for "sucking our accounts dry".
For sure, those who relied on the return from cash savings clearly
suffered during Europe's period of ultra-low to negative rates - even if
they could at least take solace from the fact that low inflation was
protecting their initial savings.
Other side-effects are harder to pick apart.
Fears of negative rates leading to money-hoarding proved largely
unfounded: in Switzerland, for example, the number of 1,000-franc notes
in circulation remained the same, suggesting customers were not
withdrawing cash to store in a safe at home.
As one Danish bank vaunted the world's first negative rate mortgage, it
is likely that cheap borrowing added steam to house price spikes across
the region. But prices were often being squeezed higher by local factors
including tight supply.
While many other elements have been at play, euro area bank stocks have
fallen some 45% since 2014 - despite ECB moves to shield them with
exemptions from charges on some deposits and access to ultra-cheap
borrowing.
Yet a report to European Parliament by the Bruegel think tank last year
concluded that overall bank sector profits had not been significantly
harmed by negative rates, noting that the downside was being offset by
gains in asset investments.
[to top of second column] |
The Swiss National Bank (SNB) logo is
pictured on its building in Bern, Switzerland April 2, 2022.
REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann
"In the end, they worked the same as normal rate cuts," said report
co-author Gregory Claeys, while acknowledging the impact may have
been greater had the experiment gone on for longer.
NO FUTURE?
The question of whether negative rates actually achieve their goals
is harder to answer given the modest extent of the trial - no one
ever went lower than minus 0.75% - and the fact that they have been
swept aside by the turmoil of the last two years.
ECB policy-makers point to data showing that lending in the euro
zone was shrinking year after year in the 2010s until negative rates
helped turn that into growth by 2016 - even though that growth has
never attained its pre-2009 heights.
Others point to the fact that the negative rate period coincided
with the vast quantitive easing with which the ECB and other central
banks around the world also boosted demand with trillions of dollars
of asset purchases.
"That was a much bigger deal - much more impactful," said Brian
Coulton, chief economist at Fitch Ratings. "Using your balance sheet
aggressively - that is a powerful weapon."
Some economists argue negative rates create perverse incentives that
ultimately do a disservice to the economy - for example by keeping
alive "zombie companies" that by rights should fold, or by removing
the impetus for governments to push tough reforms.
"What is lacking, in Europe, is the focus on structural reforms. Why
didn't they happen in the last 10 years, why didn't we strengthen
productivity growth?" said Societe Generale senior European
economist Anatoli Annenkov.
Burkhard Varnholt, Chief Investment Officer Switzerland, Credit
Suisse Switzerland, goes further, saying the message they send about
investing in the future was even akin to the nihilism of the "No
Future" refrain of the 1977 Sex Pistols' punk rock track "God Save
the Queen".
"It's the central bankers who have taken interest rates to a level
where we attach no value to the future," he said. "Today's punks
wear white shirts, grey suits and a blue tie."
As the negative rate era closes, the global pool of assets with
negative yield has shrunk to less than $2 trillion from a 2020 peak
of some $18 trillion.
Despite the misgivings, others say the experiment has at least shown
policy-makers that rates can go below zero and so is an option for
them: witness the fact the Bank of England for a while considered
that path as COVID-19 was ravaging the economy.
Even if the current inflationary bout means it could be a while
before Europe's central bankers need to use negative rates again, it
is unlikely they will want to rule them out.
"They will always be spoken of as something that remains in the
toolkit," said Rohan Khanna, strategist at UBS in London. "I am very
doubtful anyone here is ready to say never again for negative
rates."
(Additional reporting by Marc Jones, Yoruk Bahceli and Vincent
Flasseur in London; John Revill in Zurich; Reuters bureaus in
Berlin, Madrid, Lisbon and Copenhagen. Editing by Jane Merriman)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |