Widerimage: As grocery bills soar, hungry Brazilians may seal 
		Bolsonaro’s fate
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [September 29, 2022]  
		By Lisandra Paraguassu 
		 
		BRASILIA (Reuters) - The specter of hunger 
		hangs over Brazil's presidential race this year like few before it.  
		 
		Rampant inflation and fallout from the pandemic have pushed food 
		insecurity here to levels nearly unrecognizable a decade ago. One in 
		three Brazilians say they have struggled recently to feed their 
		families. 
		 
		Trailing in the polls and eager to offer relief, President Jair 
		Bolsonaro dribbled budget rules to boost Brazil's main welfare program 
		by 50% through the end of the year.  
		 
		But that has failed to move the needle so far. Opinion surveys show his 
		support among the poorest Brazilians flat or flagging since the more 
		generous payouts started. 
		 
		Welfare recipients interviewed by Reuters in a half dozen states were 
		reluctant to give Bolsonaro credit for the expiring election-year 
		benefits. Most said they are pulling for his left-wing rival, former 
		President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who slashed hunger and extreme 
		poverty with the help of a commodity boom during his 2003-2010 
		presidency. 
		 
		In the slums of Brazilian cities, families are struggling to feed 
		themselves as hunger rises in the powerhouse food exporter. 
		  
		
		  
		
		 
		"We're the forgotten ones. There is no lunch today," says Dona Monica in 
		a "favela" called Arco Iris (Rainbow) on a river smelling of sewers and 
		urine in the northeastern city of Recife where dengue is rife. 
		 
		In the center of Sao Paulo, Brazil's largest city, Carla Marquez lives 
		in a room paid for by a church with her husband Carlos Henrique Mendes, 
		25, and 5-year-old daughter. "We haven't bought food in ages. Prices are 
		absurdly high. I've nothing to give her," the 36-year old mother said in 
		tears. 
		 
		U.N. HUNGER MAP 
		 
		Brazil's election looks to be yet another case of soaring global food 
		inflation unsettling incumbents, but hunger has been mounting a comeback 
		in Latin America's largest economy for the better part of a decade. 
		 
		Just eight years ago, Brazil hit its U.N. target for eliminating 
		widespread malnourishment ahead of schedule. Since then, the share of 
		Brazilians who say they cannot feed their families in the past 12 months 
		has more than doubled to 36%, according to the Getulio Vargas Foundation 
		(FGV) think tank. 
		 
		The result is a consensus across Brazil's political establishment that 
		the country needs a stronger social safety net. Almost every major party 
		and candidate has backed 'emergency' cash stipends to 20 million 
		families, which benefit roughly one in four Brazilians – making it one 
		of the world's most far-reaching welfare programs. 
		 
		FGV's Marcelo Neri says he has never seen hunger so central to the 
		electoral debate.  
		 
		"The whole political spectrum is talking about food insecurity, the 
		emphasis is everywhere," he said. 
		 
		Bolsonaro and Lula both promise they will work to extend this year's 
		more generous welfare program or even expand it. Neither has explained 
		how they would fund this – but analysts reckon it will mean the end of a 
		constitutional spending limit that has defined fiscal policy for the 
		past six years.  
		
		
		  
		
		LULA LEADING RACE 
		 
		Voter opinion polls show that Bolsonaro did manage to narrow Lula's 
		advantage earlier this year by increasing Auxilio Brasil and working to 
		lower fuel costs, but Lula has begun to pull away again in the last two 
		weeks. 
		 
		Lula's polling lead widened to 17 percentage points in a survey by 
		pollster IPEC published on Monday, ahead of Sunday's first-round vote, 
		with 48% of voter support to 31% for Bolsonaro. The poll showed Lula 
		could win outright, with 52% of voter intentions excluding abstentions 
		and null votes. 
		
		If the race goes to a second-round runoff, Lula would win by 54% of the 
		votes versus Bolsonaro's 35%, according to the IPEC poll, which had a 
		margin of error of 2 percentage points. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Thawanny Silva de Souza, 6, (L) and 
			Rafael Silva de Souza, 9, (R) eat a lunch of rice, beans and egg in 
			their family's house, in the Arco Iris favela in Recife, Brazil, 
			September 15, 2022. Rampant inflation and fallout from the pandemic 
			have pushed food insecurity in Brazil to levels nearly 
			unrecognizable a decade ago. One in three Brazilians say they have 
			struggled recently to feed their families. REUTERS/Ueslei Marcelino 
            
			  
            "The aid has not generated the effect the government had expected. 
			The increase was seen by people as an electoral maneuver and they 
			are rejecting the ploy," pollster Felipe Nunes, of Quaest Pesquisa e 
			Consultoria, told Reuters. 
			 
			FGV economist Neri agreed Lula's credibility is higher among 
			Brazil's poor, because Bolsonaro's social welfare measures have been 
			erratic. The government reduced and then suspended emergency aid 
			after the COVID-19 pandemic, and when welfare was restored it was at 
			a lower value, he said. 
			 
			Meanwhile, food prices have continued to go up, driven up by fuel 
			and transport costs, and have risen 9.83% in the year. 
			 
			"People say Bolsonaro is helping. But he gives and then takes it 
			away. It was much better with Lula," said Luciana Messias dos 
			Santos, 29. 
			 
			In her wooden shack in Estrutural, Brasilia's largest favela, she 
			had to adapt her stove to cook with wood as fuel because gas is too 
			expensive. 
			 
			Bolsonaro has denied hunger has become critical in Brazil, irritated 
			by the importance given to the hunger issue has taken on in the 
			election campaign. 
			 
			"Hunger in Brazil? It does not exist the way it is being reported," 
			he said in August. Last week, his Economy Minister, Paulo Guedes, 
			took on a survey by the Penssan Network that said 33 million people 
			face starvation. "It's a lie. That is false. These are not the 
			numbers," he said. 
			 
			In Rio de Janeiro, welfare recipient Carla Feliciano, 38, says she 
			survives picking fruit and vegetables from dumpsters outside the 
			municipal market. She said life has gotten very difficult after the 
			pandemic under the Bolsonaro government. 
			 
			"Welfare or no welfare makes no difference. I vote for Lula. I will 
			die a Lula supporter," she said. 
			  
            
			  
			 
			WELFARE AS ELECTION PLOY 
			 
			Average income of poor Brazilians has fallen to levels of 10 years 
			ago, widening the country's stark social inequality. 
			 
			Bolsonaro has focused on winning their votes he needs to be 
			re-elected, an uphill task running against Lula, whose conditional 
			cash-transfer welfare program called Bolsa Familia lifted millions 
			from poverty when he was in office. 
			 
			Bolsonaro renamed the program Auxilio Brasil to end the association 
			of social welfare with Lula, but this has not brought the electoral 
			dividends he had hoped for. 
			 
			"Bolsonaro has tried to play this card, but it won't help him," said 
			Carla's husband Carlos, who scrapes by collecting scrap cardboard in 
			the streets of Sao Paulo. He said he will vote for Lula and his 
			Workers Party. His wife is not so sure. 
			 
			Living in a tent with her children and grandchildren just half a 
			mile from the presidential place in Brasilia, Edilene Alves, says 
			she sees through Bolsonaro's ploy. 
			 
			The distrust of Bolsonaro's motives held by Carlos and Edilene was 
			echoed by low-income Brazilians from Porto Alegre in the deep south 
			to Salvador and Recife in the northeast. 
			 
			"They think we are dumb. Increasing welfare from 400 reais ($76.05) 
			to 600 reais does not help when supermarket prices have risen so 
			much," said Edilene, a migrant from Brazil's poor Northeast. "People 
			are going to die of hunger."  
			 
			($1 = 5.2599 reais) 
			 
			(Reporting by Lisandra Paraguassu; Additional reporting by Ueslei 
			Marcelino in Recife and Pilar Olivares in Rio de Janeiro; Writing by 
			Anthony Boadle; editing by Diane Craft) 
            
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] 
			This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.  |