Amazon, major publishers win dismissal of antitrust lawsuits over book 
		pricing
						
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [September 30, 2022]  By 
		Jonathan Stempel 
		 
		NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on 
		Thursday dismissed two antitrust lawsuits accusing Amazon.com Inc and 
		five large publishers of illegally conspiring to fix U.S. prices of 
		electronic and traditional books, causing consumers and bookstores to 
		pay more. 
		 
		U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods in Manhattan accepted a magistrate 
		judge's recommendations to end both cases against Amazon, Hachette Book 
		Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishing Group, Penguin 
		Random House and Simon & Schuster. 
		 
		Consumers accused the defendants of signing agreements that let the 
		publishers inflate e-book prices by locking in a 30% "agency" fee for 
		Amazon on each sale, and guaranteeing that Amazon's prices would not be 
		undercut. 
						
		
		  
						
		Retail booksellers, meanwhile, alleged that Amazon had been awarded a 
		"discriminatory discount" on hardbacks, paperbacks and mass-produced 
		books, forcing them to pay higher wholesale prices to the publishers and 
		depressing book sales. 
		 
		According to the plaintiffs, Amazon commands 90% of retail e-book sales 
		and 50% of print trade book sales, while the publishers account for 80% 
		of both kinds of books. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            The Amazon logo is seen at the company's 
			logistics centre in Boves, France, October 6, 2021 REUTERS/Pascal 
			Rossignol/File Photo 
            
			
			  
            But in two opinions totaling 113 pages, U.S. Magistrate Judge 
			Valerie Figueredo recommended last month that both lawsuits be 
			dismissed, citing a lack of evidence of collusion. 
			 
			She found it "telling" in the e-book case that the consumers offered 
			"no plausible explanation for why the publishers would have been 
			motivated to participate in a conspiracy that further entrenched 
			Amazon's dominance as an e-book retailer." 
			 
			Woods adopted Figueredo's reasoning in full. The lawsuits were 
			dismissed without prejudice, meaning the plaintiffs can try amending 
			their complaints. 
			 
			Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests 
			for comment. Amazon had no immediate comment. 
			 
			The trade book case was led by Bookends & Beginnings, a bookseller 
			in Evanston, Illinois. 
			 
			The cases are In re Amazon.com Inc e-Book Antitrust Litigation, U.S. 
			District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 21-00351; and 
			Bookends & Beginnings LLC v Amazon.com Inc et al in the same court, 
			No. 21-02584. 
			 
			(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Matthew 
			Lewis) 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] 
			This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.  |