U.S. judge does not require Trump to attest that FBI's list of seized 
		records is accurate
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [September 30, 2022]  
		By Sarah N. Lynch 
		 
		WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on 
		Thursday ruled that former President Donald Trump does not have to 
		provide the court with a sworn statement attesting to whether he 
		believes the list of items seized by the FBI from his Florida estate is 
		accurate and complete. 
		 
		The order from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon came after U.S. Senior 
		Judge Raymond Dearie, appointed as special master at Trump's request to 
		oversee a review of the records seized from Mar-a-lago, had ordered 
		Trump's lawyers to let him know if they disputed the accuracy of the 
		government's property inventory list.  
		 
		Trump has claimed, without evidence, that the FBI may have planted 
		evidence when it searched Mar-a-lago on Aug. 8.  
		 
		Late on Wednesday, Trump's lawyers lodged a complaint with the court 
		about Dearie's demand, saying it exceeded the scope of Dearie's 
		authority. 
		 
		"There shall be no separate requirement on [Trump] at this stage, prior 
		to the review of any of the seized materials, to lodge ex ante final 
		objections to the accuracy of [the government's] inventory, its 
		descriptions, or its contents," Cannon wrote in her order. 
		  
		
		
		  
		
		 
		"The court’s appointment order did not contemplate that obligation," she 
		added. 
		 
		The government has said it carted away more than 11,000 records, about 
		100 of them marked as classified. 
		 
		The Justice Department, which was also ordered to provide a sworn 
		statement attesting to the accuracy of the inventory, has made some 
		amendments to its list, such as adding 53 documents. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Former U.S. President Donald Trump 
			attends a rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, U.S., September 3, 
			2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly 
            
			
			
			  
            Dearie was appointed by Cannon over objections from the Justice 
			Department to review the more than 11,000 records seized from Mar-a-lago 
			on Aug. 8. He is required to weed out any records that could be 
			subject to claims of attorney-client privilege or executive 
			privilege, a legal doctrine that can shield some White House 
			communications from disclosure. 
			 
			Initially Cannon ordered him to include the classified materials in 
			his review, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit 
			reversed that decision after the Justice Department filed an appeal. 
			 
			On Wednesday, Trump's lawyers told Dearie they objected to his 
			request to address whether they disputed the accuracy of the FBI's 
			property inventory list, claiming such a demand "exceeds the grant 
			of authority" that Cannon gave the special master. 
			 
			They said it is hard to find a vendor who can process the records in 
			time to meet the deadlines. The roughly 11,000 records, they say, 
			amount to about 200,000 pages. 
			 
			(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by David Gregorio) 
            
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] 
			This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
            
			
			   |