Planemakers talk up 'surge capacity' amid industrial woes
Send a link to a friend
[April 19, 2023] By
Tim Hepher and Valerie Insinna
PARIS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Planemakers have signalled a shift in
production strategy to make factories more resilient to recent supply
disruptions by adding "surge capacity," even where that means extra
cost.
Leaders of Airbus and Boeing have both used the term in recent days -
which can include expanding factory space and hiring more staff - as the
aerospace industry struggles to tame post-COVID disruption now in its
fourth year.
The move comes as experts warn delays that have seen Airbus reset
hundreds of 2024 deliveries could stretch to 2026, though both groups
confirmed underlying output goals on Tuesday.
"We live in a supply constrained environment ... Our focus is on both
capacity and quality. Like many in the industry, we do expect another
challenging year for the supply chain," Boeing Chief Executive Dave
Calhoun told shareholders.
"To support the supply chain, we've increased on-site presence, we've
ramped up internal fabrication for surge capacity and we've increased
inventory of select parts for risk protection."
Airbus, which holds its annual meeting on Wednesday, is also building in
more spare margin as it targets a two-thirds rise in core production to
75 jets a month in 2026.
Chief Executive Guillaume Faury this month agreed to open a new assembly
line in China, bringing to 10 the number of single-aisle plants
worldwide. Its target is the Chinese market but it complements an
expanding European and U.S. network.
"It is a way to be probably more in sync with the way the world is
developing, with tensions and with more complexities of doing business,"
Faury told reporters.
"Ten lines for rate 75 is also an opportunity to have what we call surge
capacity, to be able to recover in case we have difficulties, but also
to absorb difficulties here and there and be able to focus on the market
when it is moving forward."
DEFENDING AVERAGE OUTPUT
Planemakers only rarely speak of "surge capacity" in the aerospace
production system, which is seen as more capital-intensive and less
nimble than in consumer-facing industries.
But a person familiar with the change of direction said Faury was also
doubling down on the monthly target of 75 after it was delayed by a
round a year amid scepticism from suppliers.
Instead of a series of peaks, surge capacity would allow Airbus to
defend that rate on an average basis, the person said, noting that
similar tactics had been used in the auto sector where Faury spent
several years between stints at Airbus.
[to top of second column] |
The production line for the Boeing P-8
Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft is pictured at Boeing's 737
factory in Renton, Washington, U.S. November 18, 2021. REUTERS/Jason
Redmond/File Photo
Although auto firms rely heavily on overtime to meet peak demand,
analysts say there are examples of automakers installing surge
capacity for a successful product. General Motors took such a gamble
in Canada to assemble more pickups in 2020.
The risk is that when demand slows the added capacity and inventory
may no longer be profitable. Yet the stakes of sticking to previous
just-in-time methods are just as high.
"That might not be viable in a world where we have to worry about
pandemics and disruptions like the Ukraine war and sudden oil
shocks, financial crises," said Doug Royce, aerospace analyst at
Forecast International.
"You need to be able to prepare to weather storms in a way that
maybe you didn't think you had to in pre-COVID days."
A senior manufacturing source said the strategy made sense as long
as neither company over-invested in spare capacity.
"It is logical depending on the percentage of the ‘surge,’ otherwise
you just have excess people," the source said.
Calhoun acknowledged the looser industrial set-up was having an
impact on performance but added "the worst is behind us".
Airbus' tactics also reflect a shift towards the in-demand A321neo
variant, whose range makes it suitable for long trips but whose
narrow fuselage and quick assembly are hard to reconcile with the
installation of customised premium seats.
While an A320 assembly line typically runs in current circumstances
at around eight planes a month, sources say the 30% of extra work
needed to build an A321 means lines can handle as few as six planes
a month when fully deployed on that type.
That implies a blended capacity of seven planes a month per line
based on the 50-50 mix of A321 and A320 in latest deliveries - a
ratio expected to tilt towards 60% A321s based on future orders.
Airbus may therefore add more single-aisle lines at about $200
million each, one industry source said, with part of the former A380
assembly hall in Toulouse still lying vacant.
"Everyone is learning lessons from the ramp-up. Things just got a
little too lean," said Aerodyamic Advisory managing director Richard
Aboulafia.
(Reporting by Tim Hepher and Valerie InsinnaEditing by Mark Potter)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |