Cancer victims urge US judge to dismiss J&J talc unit second bankruptcy
Send a link to a friend
[April 25, 2023]
By Dietrich Knauth
(Reuters) -Cancer victims on Monday urged a U.S. judge to dismiss a
Johnson & Johnson subsidiary's second bankruptcy filing, saying the
company is abusing the bankruptcy system in its renewed attempt to
resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging that J&J's baby powder
and other talc products caused cancer.
The J&J subsidiary, LTL Management, this month filed for bankruptcy a
second time, seeking to settle all current and future talc claims for a
proposed $8.9 billion. LTL's first bankruptcy was dismissed after a
federal appeals court ruled the company was not in financial distress
and therefore not eligible for bankruptcy.
Plaintiffs have filed more than 38,000 lawsuits that have been
consolidated in federal court in New Jersey alleging that J&J talc
products sometimes contained asbestos and caused ovarian cancer or
mesothelioma. J&J has said its talc is safe, asbestos-free and does not
cause cancer.
The plaintiffs allege that J&J’s actions amount to a manipulation of the
bankruptcy system by a multinational conglomerate valued at more than
$400 billion and in little danger of running out of money to pay cancer
victims or their family members.
LTL could have made a honest settlement offer after its first bankruptcy
failed, but instead allowed itself to be stripped of funding so that its
second bankruptcy could impose the settlement on unwilling plaintiffs
and future claimants, the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote in a Monday filing
in U.S. bankruptcy court in Trenton, New Jersey.
Erik Haas, J&J's vice president of litigation said in a statement on
Monday that the settlement has significant support from other attorneys
representing cancer victims and that claimants should vote on the
proposed settlement in bankruptcy court.
[to top of second column]
|
Bottles of Johnson & Johnson baby powder
line a drugstore shelf in New York October 15, 2015. REUTERS/Lucas
Jackson
"The motion is nothing more than a
desperate attempt to prevent the tens of thousands of claimants from
deciding for themselves," Haas said.
J&J and LTL have argued that bankruptcy delivers settlement payouts
more fairly, efficiently and equitably than a “lottery” offered by
trial courts, where some litigants get large awards and others
nothing.
Lawyers opposed to the deal said J&J's settlement support number is
inflated by claimants who have never filed lawsuits against the
company and whose claims may not be fully vetted.
The healthcare conglomerate has not filed for bankruptcy itself.
Instead, it divided its consumer business in two in October 2021 and
offloaded the talc lawsuits onto the newly created subsidiary LTL.
LTL filed for bankruptcy days after it was created, putting a halt
to the lawsuits.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan, who has presided over both of
the company's bankruptcy cases, ruled last week that the cases
should remain paused for at least 60 more days.
At a hearing last Thursday, Kaplan said he "had more questions than
answers" regarding the new bankruptcy, and that LTL has an "uphill
battle" on its second attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy
court.
At the start of LTL's second bankruptcy, Kaplan rejected some
plaintiffs' demand that he immediately dismiss the new bankruptcy
case, but he said he would fully consider a more formal request made
with more evidence in support of it.
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth; Editing by David Gregorio, Alexia
Garamfalvi and Bill Berkrot)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |