|
Katie Taylor, who filed the lawsuit in 2019,
alleged the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry
clothing to Australian customers during her concert tours in the
country in 2014 and 2018 through retailers and websites.
Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic ruled that Katy Perry's
company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie
Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by
promoting the singer's products through posts on social media, a
court filing out on Thursday showed.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
"This is a tale of two women, two teenage dreams and one name,"
Markovic said in her judgment.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the
Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor, whose birth name was Katie Perry, called the verdict a
"David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
"Not only have I fought myself, but I fought for small
businesses in this country, many of them started by women, who
can find themselves up against overseas entities who have much
more financial power than we do," she said in a blog post.
Representatives of Katy Perry could not be immediately reached.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion
designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor
registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later
engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and
forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move,
Taylor said.
(Reporting by Renju Jose in Sydney; Editing by Sonali Paul)
(Photo: Katy Perry attends Variety's 2021 Power
of Women event at the Wallis Annenberg Center in Beverly Hills,
California, U.S. September 30, 2021. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.]
|
|
