Judge declines to block Colorado from banning medication abortion
reversal
Send a link to a friend
[April 29, 2023]
By Brendan Pierson
(Reuters) - A federal judge in Denver on Friday rejected a Catholic
medical center's bid to block Colorado from banning an unproven
treatment meant to reverse the effects of a medication abortion drug.
U.S. District Judge Daniel Domenico said there was no need to block the
first-of-its-kind ban because the state has said it will not enforce it
for now, meaning that the center, Bella Health and Wellness, is not
under any immediate threat. He did not address the merits of the case.
"Our clients are glad they can continue caring for women who ask for
help after taking the first abortion pill," Rebekah Ricketts, a lawyer
with the conservative legal group Becket Fund for Religious Liberty
representing Bella, said in an email.
Medication abortion begins with the drug mifepristone, which blocks
action of the hormone progesterone, crucial for sustaining pregnancy,
and is completed with a second drug, misoprostol. Proponents of
medication abortion reversal say that if a woman changes her mind after
taking mifepristone but before taking misoprostol, the pregnancy can be
continued by administering a high dose of progesterone.
There are no large controlled studies of the treatment, and the American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has said that its safety and
efficacy are unsupported.
Colorado Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, signed a law on April 14 that
would subject health care practitioners who perform medication abortion
reversal to discipline unless the state's medical licensing boards
determine that treatment is a "generally accepted standard of practice."
They also could potentially lose their licenses
[to top of second column]
|
Used boxes of Mifepristone, the first
pill in a medical abortion, line a trash can at Alamo Women's Clinic
in Carbondale, Illinois, U.S., April 20, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn
Hockstein
The law gives the boards until
October to make that determination and issue formal rules, and the
state has said it will not enforce the ban until that rulemaking
process is complete.
Bella filed its lawsuit the same day the law was signed. It alleges
that the law violates the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of free
exercise of religion, free speech and equal protection.
Mifepristone is the subject of a heated legal battle as
anti-abortion groups seek to pull it from the market. A maker of
mifepristone is challenging state restrictions on it in West
Virginia and a group of doctors is challenging restrictions in North
Carolina.
Republican state legislatures have also taken steps to restrict
access to the drug, while Democratic legislatures have sought to
protect it.
(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York, Editing by Alexia
Garamfalvi and David Gregorio)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |