A
2-1 panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals faulted a provision of Mississippi's state constitution
that mandates lifetime disenfranchisement for people convicted
of a set of crimes including murder, rape and theft.
Siding with a group of convicts who sued in 2018 to regain their
right to vote, U.S. Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote that the
state's policy violated the U.S. Constitution's Eighth
Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishments.
He said the state's constitutional provision, Section 241,
served no legitimate purpose, ensures former offenders are never
fully rehabilitated, and was adopted in 1890 after the U.S.
Civil War to "ensure the political supremacy of the white race."
The provision, whose list of disqualifying crimes had been
amended twice in the years, remained effective in achieving its
"racially discriminatory aim," Dennis said. Of the nearly 29,000
Mississippians convicted of disenfranchising offenses who had
completed their sentences from 1994 to 2017, 58% were Black, he
said.
He said Mississippi was "bucking a clear and consistent trend in
our Nation against permanent disenfranchisement," he said,
noting that 35 states plus Washington, D.C., today disavow the
practice.
Dennis was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Carolyn Dineen King in
reversing a lower-court judge's ruling. Both are appointees of
Democratic presidents on the conservative-leaning court.
"This is a major victory for Mississippians who have completed
their sentences and deserve to participate fully in our
political process," said Jonathan Youngwood, a lawyer for the
plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit.
A spokesperson for Republican Attorney General Lynn Fitch said
she would appeal the decision, as "the Supreme Court has
signaled that felon disenfranchisement is not punishment."
In a dissenting opinion, U.S. Circuit Judge Edith Jones, an
appointee of former Republican President Ronald Reagan, noted
the U.S. Supreme Court in 1974 held that state laws permanently
disenfranchising felons did not violate their equal protection
rights under the U.S. Constitution's 4th Amendment.
"Today’s ruling disregards text, precedent, and common sense to
secure its preferred outcome," Jones wrote.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; editing by Deepa
Babington)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|