In perjury trial, Madigan’s ex-chief of staff will test limits of
loyalty
Send a link to a friend
[August 08, 2023]
By HANNAH MEISEL
Capitol News Illinois
hmeisel@capitolnewsillinois.com
CHICAGO – In the summer of 2018, Tim Mapes’ name had only recently faded
from unflattering headlines after he was forced to resign from three top
jobs he held under powerful Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan.
Mapes, who’d served as Madigan’s chief of staff for more than two
decades, had been accused of sexual harassment by a woman who reported
to him in his capacity as clerk of the Illinois House. It was the third
accusation of sexual harassment within Madigan’s power structure that
year, and the speaker was facing pressure to clean house. “At my
direction,” a statement from Madigan read at the time, “Tim Mapes has
resigned.”
But despite Madigan having publicly cut ties with Mapes, the disgraced
political operative was still privy to what was going on inside the
longtime speaker’s inner circle, according to wiretapped phone
conversations captured by federal agents in 2018 and 2019. Those
recordings were captured on the cell phone of Mike McClain, Madigan’s
close friend and confidant who’d for decades also been a fixture in the
Democratic power structure that controlled the General Assembly.
In an early July 2018 call, McClain told Mapes about a dinner he and the
speaker had recently in a loud restaurant. Mapes joked that McClain
should’ve told the establishment’s management, “I’m Mike McClain, I’m
the right-hand guy to Mike Madigan.”
McClain quipped back, “I’m the right-hand guy of Tim Mapes.”
Less than three years later, Mapes would be indicted on one count each
of perjury and obstruction of justice after he told a grand jury that he
didn’t know McClain was doing Madigan’s bidding in the years after he
officially retired as a lobbyist in 2016.
Mapes allegedly lied to the grand jury despite being under an immunity
order; he’d been warned that any untruthful testimony while under the
order would result in criminal charges. But the Madigan loyalist has
maintained his innocence, and on Monday jury selection begins in his
federal trial in Chicago.
In recent weeks, Mapes and government lawyers have filed last-minute
motions trying to block each other’s witnesses and evidence, though
Judge John Kness has mostly denied Mapes’ requests.
The motions contain previews of some wiretapped phone recordings that
will be played at trial, mostly made from McClain’s cell phone. McClain
has already been convicted for his role in helping his biggest client,
electric utility Commonwealth Edison, bribe Madigan with jobs and
contracts for the speaker’s allies in exchange for legislative wins for
ComEd in Springfield.
In that seven-week trial this spring, federal prosecutors played dozens
of calls featuring McClain and showed the jury hundreds of emails that
showed the extent to which McClain went to bat for Madigan. In more than
one instance, McClain told colleagues that the speaker was his “real
client,” and a few witnesses even referred to him as a “double agent”
for both ComEd and Madigan.
McClain is also Madigan’s co-defendant in a related bribery and
racketeering case against the speaker, in which the two men are alleged
to have leveraged every position of power Madigan held – including as a
partner in his property tax-focused law firm – in a “criminal
enterprise.” That trial is scheduled for April 1, 2024.
And in this trial, federal prosecutors will attempt to show that Mapes
was well aware of McClain’s role as Madigan’s other right-hand man, a
label often used for Mapes himself in the decades he served the speaker.
In the weeks following Mapes’ ouster in early June 2018, he and McClain
spoke about a dozen times, according to federal court records.
[to top of second column]
|
The Dirksen Federal Courthouse is
pictured in Chicago. (Capitol News Illinois file photo)
“You’re the only person’s made me cry today,” McClain told Mapes on the
day he was forced to resign, according to court records. “Anything I can
do, ya know, I’m willing to do, you know that, don’t ya?”
That afternoon, McClain also told Mapes, “I never thought you would be
the one to leave the fox hole.”
Though Mapes contended that letting the jury hear certain calls between
him and McClain would be unfairly prejudicial, prosecutors argued the
calls show why Mapes was so resistant to telling the grand jury anything
that might incriminate either McClain or Madigan.
In their other calls that summer, Mapes and McClain also supported each
other through McClain’s mother’s death, which the government contends is
further evidence of their closeness. But they also discussed legislative
and political business.
In a pair of calls within a week of each other in June 2018, McClain and
Mapes strategized about fundraising within the Democratic Party of
Illinois, where Mapes had most recently been executive director under
Madigan, the longtime party chair.
In the second of those calls, McClain allegedly relayed a recent
conversation he’d had with Madigan about how to reallocate Mapes’ work
with DPI after his departure.
“This is of course relevant to Mapes’ false testimony that he was not
aware of the interactions between McClain and Madigan,” government
lawyers wrote in a filing last month. “It is also relevant to show that
McClain was stepping into Mapes’ shoes after he left, and Mapes knew
about it.”
Kness sided with prosecutors in an opinion filed last month denying
Mapes’ request to block evidence at trial – including the government’s
intention to tell the jury that Mapes violated his immunity order, which
Mapes argued was irrelevant.
“As the government argues, Defendant found himself in a difficult
position: he did not want to testify truthfully about McClain and
Madigan, but he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege because
he had signed an immunity agreement,” Kness wrote. “When faced with
potentially incriminating questions, therefore, Defendant claimed not to
remember – a difficult assertion for the prosecutor to disprove. Because
the immunity agreement explains why Defendant answered questions in an
allegedly perjurious way, the immunity agreement clears the low bar for
relevance.”
Mapes and McClain kept each other abreast of other developments in their
world for months after Mapes’ resignation, including when Mapes was
approached by FBI agents in January 2019. Mapes prepared a memo after
his meeting with the feds, and the next month told McClain about a
conversation he’d had with Madigan’s attorney, Sheldon Zenner, according
to court filings.
Mapes said he’d given Zenner the memo per “a request,” and that he was
calling McClain to “report back in” afterward.
“A jury could readily infer that Mapes made these statements to McClain
with the intent that McClain relay them to Madigan,” prosecutors wrote
last month. “At the end of the call, Mapes again says, ‘I’m just
reporting in,’ again clearly showing that he was intending to keep
McClain in the loop, so that Madigan too could be kept in the loop.”
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news
service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of
print and broadcast outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the
Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along
with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and
Southern Illinois Editorial Association. |