Republican feud over 'root canal' spending cuts raises US gov't shutdown
risk
Send a link to a friend
[August 21, 2023]
By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A feud over spending cuts between hardline and
centrist Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives raises the
risk that the federal government will suffer its fourth shutdown in a
decade this fall.
Members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus are pushing to cut spending
to a fiscal 2022 level of $1.47 trillion, $120 billion less than
President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy agreed to in their
May debt ceiling compromise.
With Republicans also seeking higher spending on defense, veterans
benefits and border security, analysts say the hardline target would
mean cuts of up to 25% in areas such as agriculture, infrastructure,
science, commerce, water and energy, and healthcare.
Centrists, who call themselves "governing" Republicans, say their
hardline colleagues are ignoring the fact that their priorities are
rejected by Democrats who control the Senate and White House, and that
spending will wind up near the level agreed by McCarthy and Biden
anyway.
The result is a major headache for centrist Republicans from swing
districts that Biden won in 2020 and others with constituents in the
firing line of hardline spending targets.
"The reductions are so deep," said Representative Don Bacon, a centrist
Republican from Nebraska. "They want to make everything a root canal."
Hardliners view the 2024 fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 as a test of
Republican resolve to reduce the federal debt and move on to reform
social programs including Medicare and Social Security.
"I don't fault any individual member for raising concerns and wanting to
make sure that the bill is right for them and for their district," said
Representative Ben Cline, who belongs to the Freedom Caucus, the
conservative Republican Study Committee and the bipartisan Problem
Solvers Caucus.
"What there has to be is an understanding that for there to be 218
Republican votes, the spending needs to be in line with pre-COVID levels
rather than the debt-limit agreement."
One significant source of frustration is hardline demands for cuts to
bills that have already been vetted by the 61-member House
Appropriations Committee.
"We're not, willy-nilly, just trying to give money away. We're trying to
focus and prioritize," said Representative David Joyce, a member of the
appropriations committee who heads the 42-member centrist Republican
Governance Group.
With Democrats opposed to hardline proposals, McCarthy can afford to
lose no more than four Republican votes if he hopes to pass all 12
appropriations bills before funding expires on Sept. 30.
"I do not know how they get themselves out of this jam," said William
Hoagland, a former Senate Republican budget director now at the
Bipartisan Policy Center think tank.
TRICKY PATH
When the House returns from summer recess on Sept. 12, lawmakers will
have 12 days to complete their bills and hammer out compromise
legislation with the Senate or risk a partial government shutdown.
McCarthy acknowledged last week they may have to resort to a stopgap
funding bill, known as a "continuing resolution," or CR, to keep federal
agencies open.
[to top of second column]
|
House Freedom Caucus Chairman U.S.
Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) and Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) wait
for the start of a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in
Washington, U.S. May 30, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
That option could be complicated by hardline demands that it include
some of former President Donald Trump's border policies, which
Democrats reject.
Some House Republicans say the challenges are similar to
disagreements McCarthy has overcome on other major legislation,
including an April Republican debt ceiling bill that cemented his
negotiating position in talks with Biden.
"The more appropriations bills we can get across the finish line,
the more we'll have the leverage we need to negotiate a good deal
with the Senate," said Representative Dusty Johnson, who chairs the
Main Street Caucus, whose members describe themselves as "pragmatic
conservatives".
Failure would mean another costly government shutdown starting in
October, which would be the fourth in a decade.
SHUTDOWN RISK
House Freedom Caucus members say a shutdown could be necessary to
achieve their objectives.
"It's not something that the members of the Freedom Caucus generally
wish for," said Representative Scott Perry, who chairs the group of
roughly three dozen conservatives.
"But we also understand that very little happens in Washington
that's difficult, without someone or something forcing it to
happen," he told Reuters.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, the top Democrat in Congress,
said last week that Republicans will be to blame for any new
shutdown "if the House decides to go in a partisan direction."
Disputes over funding and policy have shut down the federal
government three times in the past decade: once in 2013 over
healthcare spending and twice in 2018 over immigration. A 35-day
shutdown that began in December 2018 and ran into January 2019 cost
the economy 0.02% of GDP, according to the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office.
This time, the slim 222-212 House Republican majority could pay a
political price. A shutdown would disrupt the lives of Americans
barely a year before the 2024 election, when Republicans must defend
18 House seats in districts that Biden won in 2020.
McCarthy could face the prospect of having to resort to a CR that
requires bipartisan support to pass, neutralizing the hardliners,
analysts said.
That could endanger McCarthy's speakership under a deal he struck
allowing a single lawmaker to move for his dismissal.
Would the House Freedom Caucus end McCarthy's reign over a CR?
"I wouldn't go that far," Perry said. "That's a final option. We
want to work with the leadership. We want to work with Kevin, and we
think that we can."
(Reporting by David Morgan; Editing by Scott Malone and Daniel
Wallis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |