State laws, rising threats have chilling effect on transgender care
Send a link to a friend
[August 25, 2023]
By Daniel Trotta
(Reuters) - A Massachusetts healthcare center that provides
gender-affirming care says it has allocated hundreds of thousands of
dollars to protect its staff and patients, amid a rise in threats and
harassment against some treatment facilities in the United States.
The center, which asked not to be identified to avoid attracting further
aggression, said it raised $261,000 from five grants to put a security
system in place to deal with menacing phone calls, harassment and the
potential for more serious threats. It is planning to spend $98,000 a
year on security going forward.
"We could be caring for 2,000 patients or more, at the very least, with
that money," said the center's chief executive, who requested anonymity
to speak freely without compromising security or attracting trolls.
Massachusetts is not among the 20 states where legislatures with
Republican majorities have banned or restricted treatments such as
puberty blockers, hormone therapy or surgery for transgender minors.
But the political climate driving the legislation is having a chilling
impact beyond those 20 states and on patients older than 18, according
to more than a dozen care providers and transgender advocates across the
country.
They described a rise in threats against several treatment centers in
different parts of the country, including harassing and bigoted phone
calls and online messages, as well as clinics stretched thin in more
welcoming states by an influx of patients from jurisdictions where
treatment is restricted.
"You're having effects not just in states that have banned
gender-affirming care, but also in other states that are afraid of
protests," said Marci Bowers, president of the World Professional
Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), which helps establish
treatment standards for gender-affirming care.
Several of the legislative bans have been blocked in court, offering at
least temporary protection for patients but also fueling uncertainty
about what remains permitted at any one time, clinicians said.
"It's confusing to physicians. It's confusing to patients and their
families," said Jesse Ehrenfeld, president of the American Medical
Association, which represents physicians and medical students across the
United States. "It's completely inappropriate that you've got lawmakers
inserting themselves into medical decision-making."
In Florida, Senate Bill 254, enacted in May, banned gender-affirming
care for minors but also created less-noticed barriers for adult care.
One provision requires that only physicians administer puberty blockers
and hormones, instead of the nurse practitioners and physician
assistants who typically provided such care.
The law also requires the physician be present in the same room as the
patient, eliminating most virtual appointments.
Seventy clinics, representing one-fourth of the 271 specializing in
gender-affirming care in the 20 states that have enacted restrictions,
have closed since the bans began in 2021, according to a July 25
research letter in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Some 43% of transgender adults have considered moving because of anti-LGBTQ
legislation in their state, according to a survey by the liberal think
tank Data for Progress. Another 8% said they have already moved.
For some transgender people, the combination of the political discourse
and social pressure feels overwhelming.
"It really made us feel not welcome. We looked at it and we're like,
okay, there's a target on us," said Rylee Brock, a 30-year-old trans
woman who moved to Champaign, Illinois, from Omaha after the Nebraska
legislature banned surgery for transgender minors. "In Omaha, I couldn't
be myself, except in very safe spaces."
Transgender youth may adopt a specific name and pronouns and undergo
psychological counseling as part of their transition. The state laws
largely intervene to stop gender-affirming medical care around
adolescence: treatments such as puberty blockers, hormones and later, in
rare cases, surgery.
Medical consensus favors gender-affirming care as essential and
sometimes life-saving, after careful consideration by multiple
providers. The American Medical Association, the Endocrine Society, the
American Academy of Pediatrics and many other medical associations
endorse it.
Some parents and professionals have raised concerns that youth are being
rushed into treatment, while critics and supporters alike say more
research is needed.
The state legislative response has been to ban such care for minors,
providing a rallying point for conservative politicians and
organizations.
A number of them also oppose recognition of transgender identity through
bathroom bills and bans on student athletes joining sports teams that do
not align with their assigned sex at birth.
[to top of second column]
|
Legislation that has banned
gender-affirming care for transgender youth in 20 states has
reverberated beyond the borders of those 20 states and infringed on
patients older than 18, showing the far-reaching impact of the
political climate that is driving such bans. In this photo,
protesters rally for the International Transgender Day of Visibility
in Tucson, Arizona, U.S., March 31, 2023. REUTERS/Rebecca Noble/File
Photo
Gary Click, an Ohio representative
who sponsored a gender-affirming care ban that passed the Ohio House
in June and is now before the state senate, said he wants to protect
minors from the side effects of medical treatments, especially those
that they may later regret.
He said extremists who threatened clinics were motivated for their
own reasons, unrelated to legislation like his. But he also said
gender-affirming medical treatments were extreme.
"I am totally against extremism," Click said. "I think extremism
begets extremism. I'm trying to be that level-headed person that
comes in and says, 'Listen, let's look at the science.'"
EXTREMISM ON THE RISE
The FBI and U.S. Department of Homeland Security identified a rise
in "domestic violent extremism" from individuals who have easy
access to guns and a list of perceived grievances related to race
and gender, in their annual threat assessment report to Congress in
June.
The Massachusetts health center said one member of its team was "doxxed"
about six months ago by having a home address and cellphone number
published, which generated harassing calls and online posts.
Boston Children's Hospital said it endures "daily threats and
challenges," including from multiple callers opposed to its Gender
Multispecialty Service (GeMS) program, one of which resulted in a
federal indictment against a Massachusetts woman.
"Boston Children's has been subjected to bomb threats, protests,
governmental inquiries, and direct threats to individual
clinicians," the hospital said in a statement to Reuters.
Another Boston clinic, part of the renowned Fenway Institute,
received a threatening, expletive-laden telephone call that resulted
in federal charges against a Texas man.
The FBI said it "takes all potential threats seriously" but declined
to address specific investigations. The Boston Police Department and
the Massachusetts State Police did not respond to requests for
comment.
Colorado Children's Hospital said threats against other children's
hospitals providing gender care drove it to reduce its online
publicity about transgender service to protect staff.
Colorado has not enacted restrictions on gender-affirming care. But
the hospital, which generally serves patients up to the age of 22,
said it has stopped providing surgery for adult patients because of
"unprecedented referrals for gender-affirming care."
The LGBTQ health advocacy group GLMA said clinics in states such as
Colorado, Illinois, New York, California have been "absolutely
inundated" since other states started banning care. It did not
provide specific figures on referrals.
San Francisco surgeon Thomas Satterwhite, who has been doing gender
transition surgery on minor and adult trans patients for nine years,
said his practice, Align Surgical Associates, paused public comments
on its social media accounts because of a surge in bigoted comments
around last November's midterm elections.
Satterwhite said one out-of-state patient who recently came to his
clinic quizzed him about Align's security protocols and a young
medical professional whom he met at a conference and had trained in
gender care was now considering another field, he said. That person
declined to be interviewed.
ADULTS AFFECTED, TOO
The Florida law's mandate that "only a physician" may administer
treatments or prescriptions for adults, affected clinics that rely
largely on nurse practitioners and physician assistants, providers
said.
Joseph Knoll, CEO of Spektrum Health, a nonprofit specializing in
care for LGBTQ patients, said his clinics in Orlando and Melbourne
have turned away more than 100 adults and minors since the ban was
enacted.
Plume Health, a virtual gender-affirming care clinic that operates
in 45 states, said it responded to Florida's restriction on virtual
care with temporary "pop-up" in-person clinics, staffed by
physicians.
The non-profit Orlando clinic 26Health clinic said it stopped
providing gender-affirming care after the law was enacted for fear
of losing their license and having to close their doors to their
nontransgender patients.
"It is appalling, quite frankly, that we are targeting individuals
who are already vulnerable and marginalized," said Syvonne Carter,
chief executive of 26Health.
(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; editing by Donna Bryson and Suzanne
Goldenberg)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |