US sets policy to seize patents of government-funded drugs if price
deemed too high
Send a link to a friend
[December 08, 2023]
By Patrick Wingrove
(Reuters) -The Biden Administration on Thursday announced it is setting
new policy that will allow it to seize patents for medicines developed
with government funding if it believes their prices are too high.
The policy creates a roadmap for the government's so-called march-in
rights, which have never been used before. They would allow the
government to grant additional licenses to third parties for products
developed using federal funds if the original patent holder does not
make them available to the public on reasonable terms.
Under the draft roadmap, seen by Reuters, the government will consider
factors including whether only a narrow set of patients can afford the
drug, and whether drugmakers are exploiting a health or safety issue by
hiking prices.
"We'll make it clear that when drug companies won't sell taxpayer funded
drugs at reasonable prices, we will be prepared to allow other companies
to provide those drugs for less," White House adviser Lael Brainard said
on a press call.
The U.S. government has previously resisted calls to seize the patents
of costly drugs, declining in March to force Pfizer and Astellas Pharma
to lower the price of their prostate cancer drug Xtandi.
The government will give the public 60 days to comment on the new
proposal before attempting to finalize it.
Vanderbilt University professor Stacie Dusetzina said the new policy
could discourage investment in the industry if the government ever
exercised march-in rights, but might be "useful to have a credible
threat if the industry is being completely unreasonable."
Megan Van Etten, a spokesperson for the leading pharmaceutical industry
lobby group PhRMA, said allowing the government to use march-in rights
based on price would stunt innovation and harm patients.
“The Administration is sending us back to a time when government
research sat on a shelf, not benefiting anyone,” she said.
[to top of second column]
|
Isabelle Lawler, a pharmacy student, answers calls at Skippack
Pharmacy in Schwenksville, Pennsylvania, U.S., February 26, 2021.
Picture taken February 26, 2021. REUTERS/Hannah Beier/ File photo
March-in rights were introduced as a
safeguard in the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which allows the inventors
to retain ownership of inventions or products developed with public
funds and hold patents.
Under Bayh-Dole, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has the
power to seize patents of federally-funded medicines, but the
agency's former director Francis Collins said it did not have the
authority to use march-in rights to lower drug prices.
In her first briefing with reporters on Wednesday, recently
confirmed NIH Director Monica Bertagnolli said she shared concerns
over high drug prices.
"What I will affirm over and over is that I will use every tool I
possibly can with the goal of obtaining the access that our patients
need. March-in, if I am to ever apply that, it will be according to
principles that allow it to really achieve that specific aim."
Progressive lawmakers in the Democratic Party have this year heaped
criticism on drugmakers that developed therapies with government
funding, and called on President Joe Biden's administration to use
its march-in authority to lower drug prices.
In March, Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel was called to testify in
Congress after the company flagged plans to raise the price of its
COVID-19 vaccine to as much as $130 per dose, drawing the ire of
Democratic U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. The U.S. vaccine maker's
Spikevax shot was developed with the help of government funding.
Joseph Allen, who had been a staffer for Senator Birch Bayh and is
now director of The Bayh-Dole Coalition, a group that works to
educate on the law, said Congress could challenge the new policy if
found to be incompatible with the law.
(Reporting by Patrick WingroveEditing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |