Texas Supreme Court temporarily blocks woman from emergency abortion
Send a link to a friend
[December 09, 2023]
(Reuters) -The Texas Supreme Court temporarily blocked a pregnant
woman from obtaining an emergency abortion on Friday, shortly after the
state's attorney general requested the block.
The legal battle is a major test case since the U.S. Supreme Court
overturned the nationwide constitutional right to abortion last year,
enabling states like Texas to pass near complete bans.
The Texas court halted a lower court ruling allowing the emergency
abortion, responding to a petition from Texas Attorney General Ken
Paxton earlier in the day.
"Without regard to the merits, the Court administratively stays the
district court's December 7, 2023 order," the late Friday ruling said.
The woman, Kate Cox, 31, of the Dallas-Fort Worth area, sought court
authorization for the abortion because her fetus was diagnosed on Nov.
27 with trisomy 18, a genetic abnormality that usually results in
miscarriage, stillbirth or death soon after birth.
Cox, who is about 20 weeks pregnant, said in her lawsuit that she would
need to undergo her third caesarean section if she continues the
pregnancy. That could jeopardize her ability to have more children,
which she said she and her husband want.
"While we still hope that the Court ultimately rejects the state's
request and does so quickly, in this case we fear that justice delayed
will be justice denied," said Molly Duane, senior staff attorney at the
Center for Reproductive Rights.
District Court Judge Maya Guerra Gamble sided with Cox on Thursday,
issuing an order that applied only to Cox and does not expand abortion
access more broadly.
[to top of second column]
|
Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators confront during a
protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court after the leak of a draft
majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a
majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion
rights decision later this year, in Washington, U.S., May 4, 2022.
REUTERS/Michael A. McCoy/File Photo
But Paxton, who had previously
warned that any doctors involved in providing the emergency abortion
would not be safe from prosecution, asked the state's highest court
to intervene.
"Nothing can restore the unborn child's life that will be lost as a
result," the filing said.
The state's abortion ban includes only a narrow exception to save
the mother's life or prevent substantial impairment of a major
bodily function.
Cox said in her lawsuit that, although her doctors believed abortion
was medically necessary for her, they were unwilling to perform one
without a court order in the face of potential penalties, including
life in prison and loss of their licenses.
"The idea that Ms. Cox wants desperately to be a parent, and this
law might actually cause her to lose that ability, is shocking and
would be a genuine miscarriage of justice," Guerra Gamble said on
Thursday during a hearing in an Austin courtroom.
(Reporting by Daniel Trotta and by Baranjot Kaur in Bengaluru;
Editing by Stephen Coates and William Mallard)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |