| 
				According to Pew Charitable Trusts, rainy day funds hit all-time 
				highs in 38 states at the end of fiscal year 2023, including in 
				Illinois. But most states expect their total financial cushions 
				to decline by the end of the current budget year.
 After consecutive years of sizable increases, states’ combined 
				rainy day funds decreased by over $4 billion in fiscal 2023 from 
				fiscal 2022’s record high to $160 billion, according to 
				estimates collected by the National Association of State Budget 
				Officers between February and May of this year.
 
				Page Forrest, senior associate with The Pew Charitable Trusts’ 
				state fiscal policy project, said the pandemic had a big impact 
				on states' budgetary decisions. 
 “States really took advantage of the upswing in revenue that we 
				saw in fiscal 2021 and 2022 and used that to put a substantial 
				amount of funds in their reserves, which is why we are still 
				seeing those record levels,” said Forrest.
 
 At the lowest point in 2017 during Illinois’ budget impasse, the 
				rainy day fund had only $48,000, which would fund the state for 
				less than 30 seconds.
 
 In November, State Comptroller Susana Mendoza deposited $11.5 
				million into the state’s Rainy Day Fund, bringing the total to 
				$2.005 billion.
 
 Despite the improvement, Forrest said Illinois is still ranked 
				47th in the country on the amount of days the government could 
				run on the rainy day fund.
 
 “They could run for almost two weeks now, however for context, 
				the median capacity for a state is 46 days, so Illinois is still 
				lagging substantially behind the national median,” said Forrest.
 
 On the other hand, Wyoming’s state government could run 306 days 
				on its rainy day fund.
 
 The analysis points out that there is no one-size-fits-all rule 
				for states on when and how much to save. Pew’s research shows 
				the optimal savings target of state rainy day funds depends on 
				several factors, including the defined purpose of the funds, 
				changes in state’s tax revenues and the potential increase in 
				spending during economic hard times.
 
				 
				  |  |