Controversy over the renewal of the U.S.-China Science and
Technology Agreement (STA) - the first accord between the two
countries signed in 1979 after the official establishment of
diplomatic ties - has grown amid U.S. accusations of China's
theft of U.S. scientific and commercial achievements.
The U.S. State Department in August sought a six-month extension
to the pact that was set to expire that month in order to
negotiate strengthened provisions with Beijing, which has
eagerly expressed its desire for renewal.
Burns told an audience at Washington's Brookings Institution
that the agreement was the "bedrock" of U.S.-China cooperation,
but it did not account for advances such as artificial
intelligence, biotechnology, machine learning and quantum
mathematics.
"I met with the new (Chinese) minister of science and technology
just a couple of weeks ago in Beijing and we are beginning a
discussion with them on whether or not to extend it, to have a
new agreement, and what would be the issues involved, and I
think it's complicated," Burns said.
"We put down our expectations that it had to be modernized, that
it's not a given that we're going to agree. I think that both
sides agree on that," he said, adding that negotiations would
proceed over the "next couple of months."
U.S. proponents of renewing the deal argue that without it the
U.S. would lose valuable insight into China's technological
advances.
However, some Republicans in the U.S. Congress have said it
should be scrapped, citing concerns about industrial espionage,
forced technology transfers and other tactics that could fuel
China's military modernization.
Many analysts say at the very least the agreement must be
reworked to safeguard U.S. innovation in a time of heightened
strategic competition with China.
U.S. President Joe Biden and China's leader Xi Jinping agreed at
a summit in San Francisco in November to step up communication
between their two governments after diplomatic relations sank to
their lowest point earlier in the year, but the countries remain
geopolitical rivals.
(Reporting by Michael Martina and David Brunnstrom; additional
reporting by Katharine Jackson; editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|