The
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Fortenberry should not
have been tried in Los Angeles, where the Republican's campaign
allegedly received $30,000 from Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire
Gilbert Chagoury, just because federal agents who later
interviewed him about the money worked there.
Writing for a three-judge panel, Judge James Donato said the
U.S. Department of Justice could seek a new trial in Nebraska or
Washington, D.C., where Fortenberry denied knowing about illegal
contributions.
Prosecutors said Chagoury donated the $30,000 through "straw
donors" who attended a campaign fundraiser for Fortenberry in
Los Angeles. Federal law prohibits foreign nationals from
contributing to campaigns for federal, state and local offices.
Donato, a district judge who normally works in San Francisco,
said the trial did not belong in California just because
Fortenberry's alleged false statements affected investigators
there.
"This outlandish outcome cannot be squared with the
Constitution," Donato wrote for the appeals court, which heard
the case in Pasadena, California.
A spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada in Los Angeles
in a statement noted the prospect for a retrial, and added: "We
are evaluating potential next steps before deciding how best to
move forward."
Fortenberry, who turns 63 on Wednesday, represented Nebraska's
1st congressional district for 17 years before his March 2022
conviction on two counts of making false statements and one
count of scheming to conceal material facts.
He resigned from Congress that month, and was sentenced in June
2022 to two years of probation and 320 hours of community
service.
"We are gratified by the Ninth Circuit's decision," Fortenberry
said in a statement, citing his wife. "Celeste and I would like
to thank everyone who has stood by us and supported us with
their kindness and friendship."
Chagoury paid a $1.8 million fine in December 2019 to resolve a
Justice Department probe that he illegally conspired to donate
$180,000 to four candidates in federal elections.
The case is U.S. v. Fortenberry, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals, No. 22-50144.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Richard
Chang and Daniel Wallis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|