|
A jury of nine will decide whether the tweet artificially
inflated Tesla's share price by playing up the status of funding
for the deal, and if so, by how much.
Investors are seeking billions in damages from Musk, Tesla, and
several of the company's directors.
The trial is testing whether Musk, the world's second-richest
person, can be held liable for his sometimes impulsive use of
Twitter.
Tesla shareholders have accused Musk of misleading them on Aug.
7, 2018 by tweeting that he was considering taking Tesla private
at $420 per share, a 23% premium to its last closing price and
valuing the company at $72 billion, and had "funding secured."
They say Musk lied when he tweeted later that day that "investor
support is confirmed."
Tesla's share price traded above where it had been before Musk's
tweets for much of the 10-day period covered by the lawsuit, but
fell as it became clear no buyout would happen.
During the three-week trial, jurors heard testimony from
witnesses including Tesla directors, Musk's financial advisors,
and Musk himself.
Musk testified funding was not an issue when he sent the tweets.
He said he had lined up financing, including a verbal commitment
from Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, the Public Investment
Fund, and could have used his stake in SpaceX to fund the deal.
But Musk admitted on the stand that he lacked specific
commitments from potential backers.
The defense team, which also is expected to make closing
arguments on Friday, has acknowledged the tweets contained
"technical inaccuracies," but said Musk was focused on making
sure small shareholders had the same information as large
investors who knew about the potential buyout.
(Reporting by Jody Godoy in California; Editing by Noeleen
Walder)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|
