Tesla's Elon Musk found not liable in trial over 2018 'funding secured'
tweets
Send a link to a friend
[February 04, 2023] By
Jody Godoy and Hyunjoo Jin
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A U.S. jury on Friday found Tesla Inc CEO Elon
Musk and his company were not liable for misleading investors when Musk
tweeted in 2018 that he had "funding secured" to take the electric car
company private.
Plaintiffs had claimed billions in damages and the decision also had
been seen as important for Musk himself, who often takes to Twitter to
air his views.
The jury came back with a unanimous verdict roughly two hours after
beginning deliberations.
Musk was not present in court when the verdict was read but soon tweeted
that he was "deeply appreciative" of the jury's decision.
"Thank goodness, the wisdom of the people has prevailed," he said.
Nicholas Porritt, a lawyer for the investors, said in a statement, "We
are disappointed with the verdict and are considering next steps."
Shares of Tesla rose 1.6% in after-hours trading following the verdict.
"A dark chapter is now closed for Musk and Tesla," Wedbush analyst Dan
Ives said. Ives added that some Tesla investors feared Musk might have
to sell more Tesla stock if he lost.
The world's second-richest person has previously created legal and
regulatory headaches through his sometimes impulsive use of Twitter, the
social media company he bought for $44 billion in October.
Minor Myers, who teaches corporate law at the University of Connecticut
and who had previously called the investors' case strong, called the
outcome "astounding."
The U.S. anti-securities fraud law "has always been thought to be this
great bulwark against misstatements and falsehoods," he said. "This
outcome makes you wonder if it is up to the job in modern markets," he
said, adding that Musk himself was likely to "double down" on his
communication tactics after the verdict.
Musk's attention has been divided in recent months between Tesla, his
rocket company SpaceX and now Twitter. Tesla investors have expressed
concerns that running the social media company has taken up too much of
his focus.
'BAD WORD CHOICE'
Tesla shareholders claimed Musk misled them when he tweeted on Aug. 7,
2018, that he was considering taking the company private at $420 per
share, a premium of about 23% to the prior day's close, and had "funding
secured."
They say Musk lied when he tweeted later that day that "investor support
is confirmed."
[to top of second column] |
Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his security
detail depart the company’s local office in Washington, U.S. January
27, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
The stock price soared after the tweets and then fell again after
Aug. 17, 2018, as it became clear the buyout would not happen.
Porritt during closing arguments said the billionaire CEO is not
above the law, and should be held liable for the tweets.
"This case ultimately is about whether rules that apply to everyone
else should also apply to Elon Musk," he said.
Musk's lawyer Alex Spiro countered that Musk's "funding secured"
tweet was "technically inaccurate" but that investors only cared
that Musk was considering a buyout.
"The whole case is built on bad word choice," he said. "Who cares
about bad word choice?"
"Just because it's a bad tweet doesn't make it fraud," Spiro said
during closing arguments.
An economist hired by the shareholders had calculated investor
losses as high as $12 billion.
During the three-week trial, Musk spent nearly nine hours on the
witness stand, telling jurors he believed the tweets were truthful.
He said he had lined up the necessary financing, including a verbal
commitment from Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, the Public
Investment Fund. The fund later backpedaled on its commitment, Musk
said.
Musk later testified that he believed he could have sold enough
shares of his rocket company SpaceX to fund a buyout, and "felt
funding was secured" with SpaceX stock alone.
Musk testified that he made the tweets in order to put small
shareholders on the same footing as large investors who knew about
the deal. But he acknowledged he lacked formal commitments from the
Saudi fund and other potential backers.
The verdict is another victory for Musk and his lawyer Spiro after
they won a defamation lawsuit against the billionaire in 2019 over
his tweet calling a cave explorer a "pedo guy".
(Reporting by Jody Godoy in California, Hyun Joo Jin in San
Francisco, and Nivedita Balu in Bengaluru; Editing by Noeleen Walder,
Peter Henderson, Matthew Lewis and Edwina Gibbs)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |