Fourth order against gun ban enforcement issued as taxpayer costs
defending law grow
Send a link to a friend
[February 11, 2023]
By Greg Bishop | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – When the myriad cases against Illinois’ gun and
magazine ban will be resolved remains unclear, but what is certain is
taxpayers are footing the bill.
Illinois’ ban on certain semi-automatic guns and magazine capacities has
been in effect since Jan. 10. Since then, four temporary restraining
orders have been put in place, including a new TRO being issued Friday,
the second one for Effingham County.
Attorney Thomas DeVore, who secured the latest restraining order in
state court, says of the three cases he’s filed, two in Effingham County
and one in White County, 4,713 individual plaintiffs and 148 Federal
Firearms Licensees from across the state are protected against
enforcement.
A separate state-level case from Macon County resulted in a TRO for
several named plaintiffs and the plaintiff association Law-Abiding Gun
Owners of Macon County, which has around 2,100 members.
Named plaintiffs in the four separate cases with temporary restraining
orders can buy and sell guns and magazines despite the state’s gun ban.
While the state hasn’t put up much of a defense in such state-level
cases since the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the first Effingham
County temporary restraining order, there are still staff with the
Illinois Attorney General’s office funded with tax dollars putting hours
of work in.
[to top of second column]
|
More work is expected in the state-level cases as motions for discovery
and motions for declaratory judgements against the state advance. It’s
possible such state-level cases could be consolidated into one for
judicial economy.
In the federal cases, Illinois State Rifle Association Executive
Director Richard Pearons said taxpayers are in a tough spot, and it’s
aggravating.
“[The state is] defending the suit with our money and we’re suing them
with our money so they don’t have anything to lose and of course we do,
so we have to keep pressing forward just on the financial end of it,”
Pearson told WMAY.
If the state is found in violation over the ban, Pearson said there must
be more than a restoration of rights, but doubts people will be made
whole.
“The state has violated our civil rights, if we win, we get some of our
money back,” Pearons said. “Of course they never pay you the whole
amount.”
Pearson didn’t have much hope for one idea to hold people accountable
for passing laws that violate rights.
“They can just keep doing that because they have unlimited funds,”
Pearson said. “It’s really an unfair system as far as I’m concerned. I
think it should be taken out of the peoples’ pocket who voted for it.”
The state was granted a delay to March 1 in when it is to respond to the
ISRA lawsuit in Illinois’ southern federal court district, something
Pearson said will cost more money.
Greg Bishop reports on Illinois government and other
issues for The Center Square. Bishop has years of award-winning
broadcast experience and hosts the WMAY Morning Newsfeed out of
Springfield.
|