Judge rejects Trump's late offer to provide DNA in rape accuser
Carroll's lawsuit
Send a link to a friend
[February 16, 2023]
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday rejected Donald
Trump's offer to provide a DNA sample as part of a defamation lawsuit
filed against him by E. Jean Carroll, a writer who said the former U.S.
president raped her in the mid-1990s.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan said Trump's sudden
willingness after years of resistance to provide a sample, but only in
exchange for pages missing from a DNA lab report he obtained from
Carroll in January 2020, came too late.
Kaplan said Trump's offer would "almost certainly" delay a scheduled
April 25 trial and unduly harm Carroll, who has long accused Trump of
stalling. Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist, is 79, which Kaplan
noted in his decision.
"Granting Mr. Trump's request would be only the first step in
introducing a complicated new subject into this case that both sides
elected not to pursue," the judge wrote. "And Mr. Trump has given the
court no reason to believe that pursuing that course would be likely to
yield any admissible evidence, let alone a guarantee that anything
important would come of it."
Trump has denied raping Carroll.
Joseph Tacopina, who joined Trump's legal team two weeks ago, and
Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan declined to comment.
Carroll originally sought Trump's DNA to compare against a dress she
said she wore when the alleged rape occurred. She decided late last year
to go to trial without the DNA.
Judge Kaplan's decision came in the second of Carroll's two defamation
lawsuits against Trump.
[to top of second column]
|
Donald Trump rape accuser E. Jean
Carroll arrives for her hearing at federal court during the
coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in the Manhattan borough of
New York City, New York, U.S., October 21, 2020. REUTERS/Carlo
Allegri
Both concern their alleged encounter in a dressing room at a
Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan, which Carroll
described in a June 2019 New York magazine excerpt from her memoir.
Carroll sued Trump five months later, after Trump told a reporter at
the White House that he did not know Carroll, that "she's not my
type," and that she concocted the rape claim to sell her book.
The second lawsuit came in November after Trump repeated his denial,
using similar language, in a social media post the prior month.
That lawsuit also includes a battery claim under New York's Adult
Survivors Act, which gives sexual abuse victims a one-year window to
sue their attackers even if statutes of limitations have run out.
Both sides are awaiting a decision from a Washington, D.C. appeals
court on whether Trump is immune from Carroll's first lawsuit, but
not her second, because he was acting as president when he spoke.
The case is Carroll v. Trump, U.S. District Court, Southern District
of New York, No. 22-10016.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Lisa
Shumaker)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |