Supreme Court sets March timeline for oral arguments in cash bail appeal
Send a link to a friend
[January 06, 2023]
By JERRY NOWICKI
Capitol News Illinois
jnowicki@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – An appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court regarding the
constitutionality of a state law that would end cash bail appears to be
at least two months away from resolution under a new timeline approved
by the court Thursday.
Attorney General Kwame Raoul filed the agreed motion setting the
timeline for the high court’s appeal of a lower court ruling that
invalidated provisions of the SAFE-T Act criminal justice reform that
would have eliminated cash bail on Jan. 1. The motion, Raoul’s office
wrote in its filing, had been agreed to by all parties in the case,
scheduling briefs to be filed in January and February, with oral
arguments to begin sometime in March. A ruling would come sometime
thereafter at an unspecified date.
The matter came to the Supreme Court in a Friday, Dec. 30, appeal by
Raoul’s office, following Kankakee County Judge Thomas Cunnington’s
decision that lawmakers overreached their constitutional authority in
passing a measure to abolish cash bail in Illinois.
Cunnington wrote in a 36-page decision that the cash bail provisions
effectively and improperly amended a section of the state’s constitution
that states, “all persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties,”
except in a few specific circumstances.
He also wrote that ending cash bail is an improper overreach by
lawmakers, who have no constitutional authority to govern the
administrative functions of Illinois courts due to the separation of
powers. Bail, Cunnington wrote, has been held by the Supreme Court to be
“administrative” in nature.
The constitution also specifically mentions bail in a section on
victims’ rights, when it states victims have a right “to have the safety
of the victim and the victim's family considered in denying or fixing
the amount of bail.” Cunnington found that eliminating bail prevents
courts from “effectuating the constitutionally mandated safety of the
victims and their families.”
[to top of second column]
|
The Illinois Supreme Court building is
pictured in Springfield. (Capitol News Illinois file photo)
The ruling initially left the impending cash bail reform in limbo in at
least 64 of Illinois’ 102 counties that had joined the consolidated
lawsuit. A Dec. 31 order from the Illinois Supreme Court, however,
stayed the cash bail provisions’ implementation statewide until the
court could rule on an appeal to the case.
Thursday’s order set the timeline for that appeal.
On Wednesday, Gov. JB Pritzker said he was disappointed in the delayed
implementation of the reform, which he and advocates say corrects an
unfair system that allows wealthy individuals to pay their way out of
jail as they await trial regardless of the seriousness of the crime they
are accused of committing, while keeping poorer individuals who can’t
make bail incarcerated pretrial even if they’re accused of relatively
minor crimes.
The measure that would replace cash bail, should the new law be allowed
to take effect, would give judges greater authority to keep an
individual incarcerated pretrial if they’re accused of more serious
offenses, but it would also limit the number of offenses for which
pretrial detention can be ordered.
“The whole purpose here is fairness,” Pritzker said. “And I think that
we will continue to fight for that. And I think those of us who believe
in this know that there's even more work to do, but I am comfortable and
confident that this is constitutional.”
Neither Cunnington’s ruling nor the Supreme Court’s orders thus far have
invalidated other provisions of the SAFE-T Act which had already taken
effect, such as reforms to police officer training and certification
standards and police body camera requirements.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news
service covering state government. It is distributed to more than 400
newspapers statewide, as well as hundreds of radio and TV stations. It
is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R.
McCormick Foundation. |