Chemical weapons watchdog blames Syrian air force for Douma attack
Send a link to a friend
[January 27, 2023]
By Anthony Deutsch
THE HAGUE (Reuters) - The global chemical weapons watchdog on Friday
said a nearly two-year investigation had found that at least one Syrian
military helicopter had dropped gas cylinders on to residential
buildings in the rebel-held Syrian city of Douma in 2018, killing 43
people.
The April 7, 2018, attack on the outskirts of Damascus was part of a
major military offensive that returned the area to the control of forces
under Syrian President Bashar al-Assad after a prolonged Russian-backed
siege against the rebel stronghold.
A previous investigation by the Organisation for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had already concluded in March 2019 that a
chemical attack had taken place in Douma, but that inquiry had not been
mandated to assign blame.
The Investigation and Identification Team was established by member
states at the Hague-based OPCW in November 2018 to identify perpetrators
of chemical attacks in Syria after Russia vetoed the joint U.N.-OPCW
mission.
Syria denies using chemical weapons but a previous joint inquiry of the
United Nations and the OPCW found that the Syrian government used the
nerve agent sarin in an April 2017 attack and has repeatedly used
chlorine as a weapon. It blamed Islamic State militants for mustard gas
use.
The latest inquiry identified four alleged perpetrators in one air force
unit, but their names were not made public. The findings are based on
technical analysis of 70 biological and environmental samples, satellite
imagery, 66 witness interviews and ballistic and munitions testing, the
OPCW said.
"At least one helicopter of the Syrian Tiger Forces' Elite Unit dropped
two yellow cylinders containing toxic chlorine gas on two apartment
buildings in a civilian-inhabited area in Douma, killing 43 named
individuals and affecting dozens more," a summary of the report said.
The Tiger Forces are elite Syrian troops generally used in offensive
operations in the war.
“The world now knows the facts," said OPCW Director-General Ambassador
Fernando Arias. "It is up to the international community to take action,
at the OPCW and beyond.”
[to top of second column]
|
A national flag depicting a picture of
Syria's President Bashar al-Assad flutters at a checkpoint in Douma,
in the eastern suburbs of Damascus, Syria March 10, 2021. Picture
taken March 10, 2021. REUTERS/Omar Sanadiki/File Photo
The findings follow an investigation conducted between January 2021
and December 2022. The conclusions were "reached on the basis of
'reasonable grounds', which is the standard of proof consistently
adopted by international fact-finding bodies and commissions of
inquiry," the OPCW said.
The OPCW's identification team is deeply opposed by Syria and its
military ally, Russia, who say it is illegal. Damascus and Moscow
did not cooperate with the latest investigation. Both countries have
denied using banned toxic munitions and have instead said the attack
in Douma was staged.
Several Russian-backed theories about the attack were tested but
could not be substantiated, the team found. Those included chlorine
cylinders and bodies had been planted at the scene by opposition
forces and that the poisonous gas had come from a nearby warehouse
used by insurgents.
At one location where the largest number of victims was recorded
"the cylinder hit the rooftop floor of a three-storey residential
building without fully penetrating it, ruptured and rapidly released
toxic gas, chlorine, in very high concentrations, which rapidly
dispersed within the building killing 43 named individuals", an
executive summary said.
Weaponising chlorine is prohibited under the Chemical Weapons
Convention, ratified by Syria in 2013.
The chemical weapons attack in Douma triggered missile strikes
against Syrian government targets by the United States, Britain and
France a week later in the biggest Western military action against
Damascus during the civil war which began in 2011.
(Reporting by Anthony Deutsch; Editing by Nick Macfie)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|