US House Republicans bring culture wars into spending showdown with
Senate
Send a link to a friend
[July 25, 2023]
By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-controlled U.S. House of
Representatives is due to begin voting this week on a series of spending
bills that take aim at culture-war targets, putting it on a collision
course with the Democratic-led Senate and increasing the odds of a
government shutdown come October.
Before leaving for their August recess on Friday, House lawmakers will
consider two Republican appropriations bills that would provide $155.7
billion in discretionary spending for military construction and veterans
affairs, and a total of $25.3 billion for agriculture, rural development
and the Food and Drug Administration, for the fiscal year beginning Oct
1.
The measures also contain a number of measures that would limit abortion
and transgender rights. Hardline conservatives have proposed amendments
that would address other hot-button topics including immigration,
critical race theory and diversity.
The bills are the first of 12 appropriations measures that lawmakers
have been crafting to cover every aspect of government funding.
While the House Appropriations Committee has approved 10 bills so far,
all along party lines, its Senate counterpart has moved in an
overwhelmingly bipartisan manner to mark up legislation at significantly
higher spending levels.
The two chambers have until the end of the current fiscal year on Sept.
30 to pass their respective bills and hammer out compromise legislation
or risk a partial government shutdown.
Congress has not enacted 12 appropriations bills on time since fiscal
1997. Last year, spending bills were all crammed in to a sweeping
omnibus measure totaling $1.7 trillion.
But Republican leaders could face a challenge even to pass Republican
legislation in the House.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy will have to convince hardline Republican
members of the House Freedom Caucus and others that appropriations bills
will restrain discretionary government spending at a fiscal 2022 level
of $1.47 trillion. That is less than he agreed to in a deal with
Democratic President Joe Biden just two months ago.
[to top of second column]
|
The dome of the U.S. Capitol is seen in
Washington, U.S., April 17, 2023. REUTERS/Amanda
Andrade-Rhoades/File Photo
Hardline conservatives warn that they will prevent this week's
measures from reaching the floor by opposing the rule governing
debate, unless they are assured that Republican leaders will not try
to avoid the spending cuts they seek by redirecting previously
allocated money to prop up allocations.
The White House has said that Biden would veto both of this week's
House appropriations bills if they reached his desk. With House
Democrats opposing them as well, McCarthy can afford to lose no more
than four votes from his 222-212 Republican majority.
"If we don't agree with the outcome, we'll vote against the rule and
do whatever we have to do," Representative Ralph Norman, a prominent
Freedom Caucus member, said in an interview.
"Our vote is not just two, three people. It's 20-plus," he said.
Norman and about a dozen other hardliners shut down the House floor
last month to protest the $1.59 trillion spending levels for fiscal
2024 that were contained in the debt ceiling agreement negotiated by
Biden and McCarthy.
Republican leaders had initially proposed shifting an estimated $115
billion from existing Democratic programs to buoy spending on party
priorities in fiscal 2024. But hardliners want that money used
instead to pay down a national debt of more than $31.4 trillion.
About $7.5 billion of the $25.3 billion spending included in this
week's House agriculture bill results from shifts. Without that
money, the allocation would drop to $17.8 billion, which Democrats
say represents the lowest level of appropriations since fiscal 2007.
(Reporting by David Morgan in Washington; Editing by Scott Malone
and Matthew Lewis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |