First U.S. youth climate change trial kicks off in Montana
Send a link to a friend
[June 10, 2023]
By Clark Mindock
(Reuters) - One of the first climate change trials in U.S. history is
set to kick off on Monday in Helena, Montana, where 16 young people are
seeking to hold the state accountable for fossil fuel-friendly policies
that they say have exacerbated global warming and dimmed their futures.
Lawyers for the young plaintiffs will argue that the state’s ongoing
support for polluting fuels like coal and natural gas violates a state
constitutional provision that guarantees them a right to a “clean and
healthful environment." They will ask Judge Kathy Seeley, who is
presiding over the two-week trial, to issue a declaratory judgment to
that effect.
The plaintiffs, who were between 2 and 18 when they filed the lawsuit in
2020, hope such an order will set an important precedent and encourage
lawmakers in the state capital to take greater action, according to Nate
Bellinger, an attorney representing the plaintiffs with non-profit law
firm Our Children’s Trust.
“What it’ll make clear, hopefully, is that governments have a
constitutional obligation to protect their citizens – especially the
youth, the most vulnerable citizens – from the dangers of climate
change,” Bellinger said.
The plaintiffs originally had sought an injunction ordering the state to
develop a remedial plan or policies to reduce emissions. But Seeley
rejected that bid in 2021, since she said it would require the court to
make policy decisions better left to other branches of government.
The state, which has repeatedly sought to delay or dismiss the case, has
called it a "meritless" publicity stunt aimed at "shutting down
responsible energy development in our state."
Attorneys for the state have argued that climate change is a global
problem best addressed through the political process -- not the courts.
They have also said the Montana court can't grant the youth the relief
they're seeking since global warming can't be traced directly to the
state's fossil fuel policies.
The lawsuit claims the government’s “systemic authorization, permitting,
encouragement and facilitation” of fossil fuel use is exacerbating the
climate crisis, despite what they say is an affirmative duty under a
1972 amendment to the Montana Constitution to protect and improve the
environment for past and future generations.
[to top of second column]
|
Oil mixed with water from an oil spill
along the Yellowstone River is pictured in Laurel, Montana, July 6,
2011. REUTERS/John Warner/File Photo
All but the four youngest plaintiffs are expected to testify during
the trial.
The plaintiffs have also claimed that the fossil fuel-dependent
energy system degrades and depletes constitutionally protected
public trust resources like rivers, lakes, fish and wildlife that
they rely on for fishing, cultural traditions and recreation.
Last month, Seeley trimmed portions of the case that relate to the
state's energy policy, after the state legislature repealed
provisions explicitly promoting fossil fuels.
She declined to call off the trial, as the state requested, finding
other changes to challenged state policy hadn't substantively
altered the case. The Montana Supreme Court turned away a bid to
delay it earlier this week, making it the first youth climate case
to go to trial.
Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
at Columbia Law School, said the trial, which is only the second on
climate change in the U.S., is a significant step forward for
climate litigation.
“A favorable decision could have a ripple effect around the world,
inspiring new cases under multiple theories," he said
The lawsuit is one of several constitutional climate cases filed by
Our Children’s Trust on behalf of youth plaintiffs. A federal case
that was dismissed in 2020 by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
was revived earlier this month. A similar case in Hawaii was set to
head to trial in September, but has been delayed.
(Reporting by Clark Mindock, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Chizu
Nomiyama)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|