Boris Johnson deliberately misled parliament, says UK report dubbed 'a
charade' by ex-PM
Send a link to a friend
[June 15, 2023]
By Elizabeth Piper and William James
LONDON (Reuters) -Boris Johnson deliberately misled the British
parliament in an unprecedented way over rule-breaking parties at his
office during COVID-19 lockdowns, a committee said on Thursday in a
damning verdict that further tarnished the former prime minister
Almost a year ago, Johnson was talking about remaining prime minister
into the 2030s. But the privileges committee - the main disciplinary
body for lawmakers - said on Thursday he should now be stripped of
having automatic access to parliament.
The committee also accused Johnson of being "complicit in a campaign of
abuse and attempted intimidation" towards them.
In typically combative style Johnson, who in 2019 led the Conservatives
to a landslide election victory, dismissed the report as "a lie" and "a
charade", and accused committee members of waging a vendetta against
him.
The stand-off will do little to heal the deep divisions in the
Conservatives and can only pile pressure on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak,
whose push to try to boost Britain's flagging economy is being
overshadowed by the ongoing Johnson drama.
The more than 100-page report detailed six events held at Downing
Street, the prime minister's offices and residence.
"We conclude that in deliberately misleading the House Mr Johnson
committed a serious contempt," the committee said:
"The contempt was all the more serious because it was committed by the
prime minister, the most senior member of the government. There is no
precedent for a prime minister having been found to have deliberately
misled the House (of Commons, lower house of parliament)."
It recommended that he should not be entitled to a former member's pass,
which enables most former prime ministers and lawmakers to gain
automatic access to parliament. Parliament will consider the committee's
recommendation on Monday.
Asked about the report's conclusions, a spokesman for Sunak said the
prime minister had not as yet read it but he believed the committee had
carried out the inquiry properly and "that it would not be right to
traduce or criticise the work" of it.
The committee, made up of four Conservatives and three opposition
lawmakers, rejected Johnson's defence that the gatherings were within
the rules and that his advisers had supported his belief that was the
case.
Instead, it said, Johnson was "deliberately disingenuous when he tried
to reinterpret his statements to the House to avoid their plain meaning
and reframe the clear impression that he intended to give".
[to top of second column]
|
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson
attends a news conference during a NATO summit in Madrid, Spain June
30, 2022. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo
It said that were Johnson still a member of parliament, it would
have recommended a suspension from the House of Commons for 90 days.
"DAMNING"
Johnson resigned from parliament last week after seeing an advance
copy of the report, calling the inquiry a "witch hunt", a criticism
he made again after its publication.
"I believed, correctly, that these events were reasonably necessary
for work purposes. We were managing a pandemic," he said in a
statement.
He said the report marked a "dreadful day" for members of parliament
(MPs) and for democracy. "This decision means that no MP is free
from vendetta, or expulsion on trumped up charges by a tiny minority
who want to see him or her gone from the Commons," he said.
He accused the committee of using mystical powers to see things that
he had not seen at Downing Street, when, he said, he was duty bound
to thank staff who were departing or for their work on COVID-19. The
committee did not accept his defence.
The Labour Party said the report was "damning".
"While Rishi Sunak is distracted with the ongoing Tory soap opera
people are crying out for leadership on the issues that matter to
them," said Thangam Debbonaire, a member of Labour's top team.
A former Johnson aide said the report did little more than confirm
his "semi-retirement" from where he would still exert "huge
influence" over the Conservative Party.
Johnson has apologised for his conduct but repeatedly denied
deliberately misleading parliament, saying he took advice from his
aides that his office were following the rules.
But so-called Partygate spelt the beginning of the end for his
tenure as prime minister. A rebellion in the Conservative Party last
year, when ministers resigned en masse, forced him in July to say he
would step down. He left office in September.
He resigned from parliament last week, ending his time as a
so-called backbench lawmaker who continued to wield significant
influence within the Conservatives that at times undermined Sunak's
authority.
They have also rowed this week over the former prime minister's
resignation honours list.
(Reporting by Elizabeth Piper, Alistair Smout, Andrew MacAskill,
Kylie MacLellan, Muvija M and William James; Editing by Kate Holton,
Frank Jack Daniel and Angus MacSwan)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |