Affirmative action, student debt rulings loom at US Supreme Court
Send a link to a friend
[June 19, 2023]
By John Kruzel and Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to decide by
the end of this month the fate of race-conscious collegiate admission
policies, one of the major disputes - also including cases involving
LGBT rights and student debt forgiveness - still yet to be resolved as
the justices speed toward the end of their current term.
The court's conservative justices, who hold a 6-3 majority, signaled
skepticism during oral arguments in December toward the legality of
student admissions policies employed by Harvard University and the
University of North Carolina. The pending rulings concerning the two
elite schools could end affirmative action programs that have been used
by many U.S. colleges and universities for decades to increase their
numbers of Black, Hispanic and other underrepresented minority students.
The conservative justices a year ago wrapped up a watershed term in
which the court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that had
legalized abortion nationwide - a decision that opened the door to a
series of state bans on the procedure - and expanded gun rights.
Opinion polls have revealed a sharp drop in public confidence in the top
U.S. judicial body, which also has been embroiled in ethics
controversies - in particular revelations about ties between
conservative Justice Clarence Thomas and a Texas billionaire.
Against this backdrop, the court is again poised to decide cases with
the potential to reshape key areas of law and impact life for millions
of Americans. The court began its term in October and typically finishes
by the end of June each year.
The Supreme Court already has ruled in two major race-related cases. In
a 5-4 ruling on June 8, it found that a Republican-drawn electoral map
in Alabama violated a federal law prohibiting racial discrimination in
voting. In a 7-2 ruling on June 15, it threw out a challenge to
decades-old federal standards that give preferences to Native Americans
and tribal members in the adoption or foster care placements of Native
American children.
In both cases, the challengers argued that laws designed to protect
certain minorities allowed unlawful racial discrimination against other
Americans.
In the student admissions cases, the challengers - a group founded by
anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum - accused the two schools
of discriminating against white and Asian American applicants. Harvard
and UNC have said they use race as only one factor in a host of
individualized evaluations for admission without quotas as they seek
campus diversity to enrich the educational experience of all students.
[to top of second column]
|
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen
in Washington, U.S., April 6, 2023. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File
Photo
The justices also are due to decide the legality of President Joe
Biden's plan to cancel $430 billion in student loan debt. During
oral arguments in February, the court's conservatives indicated
skepticism over the legality of Biden's plan to eliminate debt for
some 40 million student borrowers, as he promised as a candidate in
2020.
Biden's plan, announced last year, was challenged by
conservative-leaning Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and
South Carolina and a pair of individual borrowers opposed to the
plan's eligibility requirements.
In another major case, the court could make it easier for businesses
to refuse to provide certain services to LGBT customers in a case
involving Colorado website designer Lorie Smith's bid to refuse to
design wedding websites for same-sex couples. Smith's challenge to
Colorado's anti-discrimination law contends that she is an artist
and enjoys a free speech right under the U.S. Constitution's First
Amendment to refuse to express messages contrary to her Christian
faith.
The justices also are poised to decide a case that could undercut
presidential power over immigration in a challenge by
conservative-leaning Texas and Louisiana to Biden's policy narrowing
the scope of who can be targeted in immigration enforcement actions.
Other pending decisions include a former U.S. Postal Service
carrier's lawsuit that could make it easier for employees to seek
religious accommodations from employers and a man's appeal of his
conviction in Colorado for stalking a woman in a First Amendment
case that could clarify the line between legally protected speech
and criminal threats.
The justices also could rule in a major case in which Republican
officials in North Carolina are seeking to give state legislatures
far more power over federal elections, though they may dismiss it
because of a lower court's reversal.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York and John Kruzel in
Washington; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |