Fed members, shaping the 2024 campaign economy, head to Capitol Hill
Send a link to a friend
[June 21, 2023] By
Howard Schneider
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and
nominees for three Fed Board seats will testify on Capitol Hill
Wednesday, laying out over several hours of hearings a set of views that
could broadly shape the economic conditions facing the country during a
contentious presidential election campaign next year.
The themes will likely sound familiar given the consensus currently
driving central bank policy: Inflation is too high and interest rates
need to remain restrictive to fight it; the job market remains strong
and may even need to weaken some for prices to cool; bank failures in
March haven't rattled the financial system in a fundamental way.
But next year's economic landscape, when the U.S. may face an
era-defining rematch between incumbent Democrat Joe Biden and Republican
former President Donald Trump, could well be made or broken by upcoming
Fed decisions over how much higher interest rates need to rise, and
whether the bias remains towards controlling inflation even at the
possible cost of a recession.
"The economy faces multiple challenges, including inflation,
banking-sector stress, and geopolitical instability. The Federal Reserve
must remain attentive to them all," Fed Governor Philip Jefferson said
in prepared testimony released on Tuesday, ahead of Wednesday's 10 a.m.
(1400 GMT) Senate Banking Committee confirmation hearing for his
nomination as vice chair. "Inflation has started to abate, and I remain
focused on returning it to our 2% target."
Fed Governor Lisa Cook is up for appointment to a full 14-year term on
the seven-seat Board of Governors, and Adriana Kugler, the U.S.
executive director to the World Bank and the first Fed board nominee of
Hispanic heritage, has been nominated to an open board seat.
Across the Capitol complex, Powell will appear before the House
Financial Services Committee in one of his regularly scheduled
twice-yearly monetary policy updates, also to begin at 10 a.m.
Despite the consensus on lowering inflation, the Fed is also reaching a
point where opinions about the need for and timing of additional
interest rate increases may start to diverge. As it did for past
presidential incumbents, how that debate gets resolved could make the
difference between a benign election-year economy and a corrosive one.
For Biden, the success or failure of Fed policy could mean a "soft
landing" of continued economic growth, lower inflation and only modestly
higher unemployment, or it could force him to campaign against a
backdrop of increasing joblessness, stubbornly higher prices, and
punishing interest rates for anyone trying to buy a home or car or
finance a business.
The outcome of the Fed's inflation battle may still take months to spool
out, and “the closer it happens to election day the worse it is for
Biden," said Preston Mui, senior economist with Employ America, a
research and advocacy group that focuses on full-employment policies.
Mui said recent data have made the achievement of a "soft landing" seem
more likely, though the Fed still is primed for further rate increases
that could raise the possibility of a recession or an unnecessary
increase in unemployment.
[to top of second column] |
The U.S. Capitol dome is seen from the
Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S.,
April 19, 2023. REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger
The Fed at its meeting last week held its benchmark interest rate
steady at between 5% and 5.25%, but officials projected rates will
have to increase another half percentage point by year's end because
inflation has been falling so slowly and remains more than double
the Fed's 2% target.
JOBS AND INFLATION
At this point in his first term Biden is given particularly low
marks for his management of the economy, despite near-record-low
unemployment, steady job gains and rising wages.
Rising prices, which at one point or another have touched food and
gas as well as discretionary goods and a variety of services, may be
one reason why.
In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted June 2-5, just 35% of respondents
approved of Biden's economic stewardship. Some 53% disapproved,
according to the poll, which had a three-percentage point margin of
error.
Just 25% of respondents approved of how Biden has handled
inflation.
In large part that job has fallen to the Fed, but it is a central
bank of Biden's making. If the current crop of nominees is approved
five of seven board members would be Biden appointees. It would also
be the most diverse board in the Fed's history, with two Black board
members including the vice chair, the first Hispanic, and as many
women, three, as white men, the Fed's traditional recruitment pool.
Powell was initially elevated to Fed chair by Trump but reappointed
by Biden.
The Fed under Powell has raised interest rates faster than at any
time since former Fed Chair Paul Volcker's inflation fights of the
1970s and 1980s.
Though Fed officials and economists disagree over whether there
needs to be a tradeoff with unemployment to control inflation - a
deeply rooted concept in economics, with labor "slack" seen
loosening the pressure on prices - policymakers at last week's
central bank meeting projected the jobless rate will continue to
rise from now through 2024.
The increases are modest, from the current 3.7% to 4.1% by the end
of this year. But the rate also continues increasing through the
election year, to 4.5% - the equivalent of about 1.3 million lost
jobs from today's level.
For U.S. electoral politics, a backdrop of rising unemployment is
hard on incumbents, and data from May show some of the risk for
Biden. The unemployment rate for Black Americans, a constituency
central to his 2020 victory, jumped nearly a full percentage point -
an increase which, if sustained or added to, could raise the
political stakes around the Fed's inflation fight.
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Additional reporting by Jason
Lange; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea Ricci)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |