Stalled bills include repeal of subminimum wage for disabled workers,
BIPA reform
Send a link to a friend
[June 21, 2023]
By CAPITOL NEWS ILLINOIS
news@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – While hundreds of bills cleared the General Assembly in
the final month of the legislative session, some big-ticket measures
will have to wait until at least the fall.
Sponsors of several stalled bills say they will consider reviving their
proposals when lawmakers return to the Capitol in October and November
for their annual veto session. Below is a look at some of the bills that
didn’t pass in the regular session and whether they’re likely to come
back up for a vote.
Subminimum wage: State Rep. Theresa Mah, D-Chicago, led a late push to
prohibit Illinois businesses from participating in a federal program
that allows them to pay individuals with disabilities below the minimum
wage. It came just short of passing, although Mah says she has the votes
to pass it in the fall.
The measure would have set a July 1, 2027, end date for Illinois
businesses to participate in the subminimum wage program under the
federal Fair Labor Standards Act. That program allows employers of
individuals with disabilities to obtain a certificate allowing them to
pay less than the state and federal minimum wage. Advocates say a review
of state records shows some certificate holders have paid wages lower
than $1 per hour.
According to the Illinois Department of Human Services, there are about
4,000 individuals employed under the program in Illinois and about 80
businesses have received certificates. Once the program ends, those
workers would be subject to the statewide minimum wage.
The measure would also create a transition grant fund to support
employer wage subsidies and other efforts to ensure a smooth transition
and continued employment for disabled individuals.
Mah said the bill represented an agreement between IDHS and a trade
group representing facilities that employ disabled individuals that was
finalized late in the legislative process. But due to the crazed pace of
the final week of session and attendance issues on the House floor, Mah
said the measure fell just short of the 60 votes needed to pass.
“We kind of ran out of time during the last three days of session,” Mah
told Capitol News Illinois.
She said while she has the votes to pass the measure in the veto
session, the effective dates of some of the bill’s provisions might have
to be pushed back due to a constitutional requirement that a bill must
pass with three-fifths majorities to have an immediate effective date
after May 31.
Mah initially pushed for ending subminimum wage for disabled individuals
in 2019, an effort advocates said would help Illinois “get right with
history.” It stalled that year but again gained steam after Gov. JB
Pritzker signed an executive order in October 2021 preventing the state
from entering into contracts with entities that pay disabled workers
less than the minimum wage.
The bill’s proponents noted the 2027 end date would create a four-year
window for an existing state task force to determine the best path
forward for distributing subsidies from the grant fund and minimizing
disruption for employed individuals. The bill would expand that task
force to add more representatives of disability care providers affected
by the end of subminimum wage.
It also would increase a state- and federal-funded “personal needs
allowance” for individuals living in a Community Integrated Living
Arrangement to $100 from $60 monthly.
Biometric privacy: Another stalled measure would have made changes to
the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act, a 2008 law that allows
individuals to sue companies over improper collection or storage of
information such as fingerprints or facial scans.
Senate Democrats filed language to alter BIPA in an amendment to House
Bill 3811 on what was scheduled to be the final day of the spring
session before it was extended, immediately drawing criticisms from
business groups.
In the last five years, upwards of 2,000 lawsuits have been filed under
BIPA, followed by several high-dollar settlements. Those legal
developments, in addition to a series of Illinois Supreme Court
decisions interpreting BIPA’s limits in ways that favor aggrieved
parties, have worried the business community.
Fast food chain White Castle, the defendant in one of the two BIPA-related
cases decided by the state’s high court in February, claims the court’s
ruling could cost the company $17 billion – a figure that businesses
warn could bankrupt entire industries. The court in that case found that
claims could accrue for each violation of BIPA, meaning every individual
finger or facial scan would constitute a separate violation of the law.
The opinion did, however, “respectfully suggest” the General Assembly
review BIPA “and make clear its intent regarding the assessment of
damages under the Act.”
In response, the late-session amendment would have stipulated that “the
same biometric identifier from the same person using the same method of
collection has created a single violation,” but business groups said the
language was too vague.
They also assailed the proposed fine increase for negligent violations
from $1,000 to $1,500 and decried the addition of another type of
biometric data to the law – electronic signatures – as a giveaway to
trial lawyers.
After business groups balked at the proposal, Senate Democratic leaders
agreed to hold off on the bill pending further negotiations, meaning the
high court’s suggestions will go unheeded at least until the fall veto
session.
[to top of second column]
|
State Rep. Theresa Mah (center,
D-Chicago) speaks to a House committee in the final week of the
spring legislative session. She is sponsoring a bill that would end
the practice of allowing some employers to pay disabled individuals
less than the minimum wage. (Capitol News Illinois photo by Jerry
Nowicki)
Human composting: House Bill 3158 would have legalized and regulated
“natural organic reduction,” a process also known as human composting or
terramation in which human remains are rapidly decomposed into compost.
The process turns human remains into dirt over the course of several
weeks by heating a person’s remains in a vessel with wood chips, straw
and other organic material to accelerate the growth of microbes that
break down the body. This is distinct from “natural burial,” in which a
body is buried with no casket or in a biodegradable container.
The measure passed the House 63-38 on March 24 and was later discussed
in a subject matter hearing in the Senate. But it never received a
committee vote or consideration by the full Senate.
Bill sponsor Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago, said she will continue to
push for its passage, but she did not have a specific timeline for when
it may be considered.
“We had been working on the bill in the House for a couple of years, so
folks were a little more familiar with it,” she said in an email
statement. “This is a whole new topic for the Senate, and between that
unfamiliarity and the dishonest arguments of the opposition, we need to
spend time having those direct conversations with members of that
chamber and get their questions answered.”
Cannabis car search: Senate Bill 125 would have ensured that the smell
of “burnt or raw cannabis in a motor vehicle” cannot alone be probable
cause for an individual’s vehicle to be searched if the driver is 21
years of age or older.
The measure passed 33-20 in the Senate on March 30 but faced opposition
from law enforcement groups and never came to a vote in the House.
Sen. Rachel Ventura, D-Joliet, said the measure may be revisited in the
fall veto session with other cannabis-related measures, but multiple
pending state court cases are already centered on the issue, so it might
not need to be decided by the legislature.
The Illinois Supreme Court has agreed to hear three cases pertaining to
the issue, with two of the cases being consolidated. Two of the cases
out of the 3rd District Appellate Court ruled that the smell of cannabis
cannot alone be probable cause to pull a vehicle over. The 4th District
Appellate Court came to the opposite ruling.
“We’re allowing the courts to take their view on it,” Ventura said.
Ventura said she’s hoping the Illinois Supreme Court rules in favor of
protecting against searches based on the smell of cannabis, but she’s
willing to bring the bill back in the fall if needed.
“I’m hoping not to go that route. I’m very hopeful that the courts will
rule in the direction of the 3rd (District) Appellate Court,” Ventura
said.
Corruption convictions: House Bill 351 would have barred anyone
convicted of a felony, bribery, perjury or misuse of public funds while
serving as a public official from ever being elected to a state or local
office again.
The bill would have allowed exceptions for people whose convictions have
been reversed or pardoned, or if they’ve received a restoration of
rights. It also calls for setting up a task force to review current
policies and make recommendations for disqualifying offenses.
Current law bars anyone convicted of a felony from holding a state
office until they’ve completed their sentence and a provision of the
Illinois Municipal Code bars anyone who has ever been convicted of a
felony from holding an elected municipal office. But those people are
free to run for the General Assembly, governor or any other
constitutional office once they’ve completed their sentence.
While the measure passed unanimously in the House and cleared Senate
committee 12-0, it never received a vote in the full Senate.
A spokesperson for Senate President Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, who
sponsored the bill in the Senate, said he plans to call it for a vote in
the veto session.
Government electric vehicles: Senate Bill 1769 would have required all
passenger vehicles purchased by the state to be “zero-emission” by 2030,
meaning they produce no greenhouse gases. The bill exempts law
enforcement vehicles and vehicles bought by the Department of
Transportation as part of a consolidated procurement.
It initially passed the Senate in mid-May on a 33-20 vote but was later
amended in the House, passing 69-35 on May 25. It never came back to the
Senate for a final vote.
“I’m being told this will be heard in veto session,” Ventura said,
noting that her discussions with legislative staff are ongoing.
‘Rainy day’ fund: Comptroller Susana Mendoza pushed for House Bill 2515,
a bill requiring automatic deposits in the “rainy day” and pension
stabilization funds when revenue projections exceed the prior year’s
estimate by at least 4 percent and the state has less than $3 billion in
bills awaiting payment.
While that bill cleared a House committee unanimously in March, it never
came to a vote in either chamber. Mendoza’s office said she would
continue to push for the measure.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news
service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of
print and broadcast outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the
Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along
with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and
Southern Illinois Editorial Association. |