Big US banks to fare well in annual health checks despite spring turmoil
Send a link to a friend
[June 26, 2023] By
Pete Schroeder
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Big U.S. lenders are expected to show they have
ample capital to weather any fresh turmoil in the banking sector during
this week's Federal Reserve health checks, although resulting investor
payouts are likely to dip slightly, analysts said.
The central bank on Wednesday will release the results of its bank
"stress tests" which assess how much capital banks would need to
withstand a severe economic downturn.
The annual exercise, introduced following the 2007-2009 financial
crisis, is integral to banks' capital planning, dictating how much cash
they can return to shareholders via dividends and share buybacks.
The 2023 tests come in the wake of this year's banking crisis in which
Silicon Valley Bank and two other lenders failed. They found themselves
on the wrong end of Fed interest rate hikes, suffering large unrealized
losses on their U.S. Treasury bond holdings which spooked uninsured
depositors.
Wall Street lenders including Citigroup Inc, Bank of America , JPMorgan
Chase, Goldman Sachs Group, Wells Fargo, and Morgan Stanley usually
attract the most attention. But with continued investor jitters over the
sector, smaller lenders including Capital One, U.S. Bancorp, and
Citizens are likely to be in the spotlight too.
Despite the turmoil, and the exam being the hardest in years, bank
analysts and executives expect the 23 lenders being tested will show
capital in excess of regulatory minimums.
"The 2023 Fed Stress Test throws the kitchen sink at banks and allows
them to show that the largest banks can handle one of the toughest tests
yet," Wells Fargo analysts wrote on Thursday.
"Dividends should be secure, and banks should have excess capital to
return to shareholders under most circumstances, even if at a slower
pace than in the past."
The industry has performed well in recent years, although the Fed has
faced criticism after the spring bank failures for not probing bank
weaknesses for rising rates in prior tests.
Last year, the Fed found banks would suffer a combined $612 billion in
losses in a severe economic downturn, but that would still leave them
roughly twice the capital required under Fed rules.
This year's test is even tougher. The Fed's "severely adverse" scenario
envisages the unemployment rate jumping 6.5 percentage points, compared
with 5.8 percentage points in 2022. That's because the test gets harder
as the real economy grows stronger, and the real U.S. jobless rate is
lower in 2023.
[to top of second column] |
A person walks past a Bank of America
sign in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S.,
January 19, 2022. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri
The test will also envisage a 40% slump in the prices of commercial
real estate, an area of greater concern this year as lingering
pandemic-era office vacancies stress borrowers.
How well a bank performs dictates the size of its "stress capital
buffer" - an extra cushion of capital the Fed requires for banks to
weather the hypothetical economic downturn, on top of regulatory
minimums required to support daily business. The larger the losses
under the test, the larger the buffer.
The Bank Policy Institute, a Washington bank lobby group, said on
Thursday it anticipates banks' hypothetical losses will be slightly
higher this year. Average capital levels will fall by 3.2% in 2023,
up slightly from 3% in 2022, it predicted.
RBC analysts predicted earlier this month that hypothetical credit
losses will be largely driven by commercial real estate exposure,
and that some banks would face higher buffers.
That, combined with impending new capital hikes and uncertainty over
the economic outlook, will make banks slightly more conservative
about payouts this year, said analysts.
"Capital return expectations continue to get ratcheted down given
looming headwinds," said Jefferies analysts this month.
Last year's test was relatively straightforward partly because the
Fed did not have a Vice Chair for Supervision since Randal Quarles
stepped down in 2021. This year, the tests are being overseen by his
successor Michael Barr, who has said he wants to make them more
dynamic by applying multiple scenarios.
This year, for example, also includes an "exploratory market shock"
for the eight largest and most complex banks. While that will not
affect capital, it will be used to assess potentially employing
multiple scenarios in future stress test exercises.
"In an environment of ever-changing risks, stress tests can quickly
lose their relevance if their assumptions and scenarios remain
static," said Barr in December.
(Reporting by Pete Schroeder; editing by Michelle Price and Deepa
Babington)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |