Ex-politician says bribery, official misconduct statutes are
unconstitutional
Send a link to a friend
[March 08, 2023]
By Brett Rowland | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – The 80-year-old man once called the "Velvet
Hammer" for his successful dominance of Illinois politics is arguing the
state's bribery and official misconduct statutes are unconstitutional
ahead of his corruption trial.
Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan served in the Illinois
House from 1971 to 2021. From 1997 to 2021, he served as speaker of the
Illinois House, making him one of the state's most powerful politicians.
He faces 23 counts of racketeering, bribery and official misconduct as
part of a federal indictment. Madigan said he was just doing his job as
a politician and that the state's laws are overly broad.
"Political officials routinely work with lobbyists and entertain
outreaches from their constituents," Madigan's attorneys wrote in a
pre-trial motion seeking to have many of the charges dismissed. "This
conduct is central not only to the conduct of office but also to
American democracy."
His attorneys further argue that "statutes that impermissibly chill such
interactions infringe on rights that go to the core of democratic
government and violate the First Amendment."
Madigan was initially charged along with co-defendant Michael McClain,
in March 2022 with 22 counts of racketeering and bribery for his alleged
improper dealings with the state's largest utility, ComEd. Prosecutors
further alleged that he used his political power to unlawfully steer
business to his private law firm, Madigan & Getzendanner. In October
2022, prosecutors filed a superseding indictment that charged Madigan
and McClain with conspiracy related to an alleged corruption scheme
involving AT&T Illinois.
Madigan's attorneys said that federal prosecutors failed to make their
case that Madigan engaged in quid pro quo transactions.
"The government alleges that ComEd hired certain individuals or entities
at Madigan’s recommendation and contends that, because legislation
affecting ComEd passed the Illinois General Assembly during the same
decade, crime was afoot. That is not enough. Yes, the government
identifies votes Madigan cast or positions he took with respect to
certain energy legislation, but it fails to assert that Madigan took any
of those votes or positions for the purpose of benefiting ComEd in
exchange for its hiring decisions."
In July 2020, ComEd agreed to pay $200 million to resolve a criminal
investigation into an eight-year bribery scheme, according to the U.S.
Department of Justice. The company entered into a deferred prosecution
agreement in which it admitted it arranged jobs, vendor subcontracts and
payments for associates of Madigan to help ComEd with its efforts in the
legislature.
[to top of second column]
|
David Parker, an associate professor at Saint Xavier University, said
Madigan's attorneys are challenging the official misconduct statute
itself.
"They are saying any conviction under this law would be unconstitutional
because 'any act' is way too broad, too vague," Parker said.
The state's official misconduct statute says "A public officer ...
commits misconduct when, in his official capacity ... [he] [s]olicits or
knowingly accepts for the performance of any act a fee or reward which
he knows is not authorized by law."
Parker said Madigan's motion aims to undercut the prosecution's case.
"They're trying to take away as much of the foundation of government's
case as they possibly can," Parker said.
The defendant's attorneys argue Madigan was doing his job as a
politician.
"It is not enough to allege that Madigan took actions that happened to
benefit ComEd – indeed, myriad interest groups across Illinois supported
the same legislation as ComEd. Nor would it be enough for the government
to allege that Madigan took actions intending to benefit ComEd," they
wrote in a pre-trial motion. "The government must allege that Madigan
solicited jobs from ComEd intending to take actions in the Illinois
General Assembly to benefit ComEd in exchange for ComEd’s hiring
decisions. It has not done
Madigan's attorneys said it would be impossible to operate a political
system under the state's existing laws, which they argue are
unconstitutional because they are overly broad.
"Under the government’s theory of prosecution, the only way for state
legislators to avoid committing a federal crime with assurance would be
to abstain entirely from recommending individuals for jobs with private
companies that might possibly be affected by legislation," they wrote.
"That is not and cannot be what the law requires."
Madigan has pleaded not guilty. He previously said he spent 50 years
working to serve the public.
"I was never involved in any criminal activity," he said in a statement
in March 2022. "The government is attempting to criminalize a routine
constituent service: job recommendations. That is not illegal, and these
other charges are equally unfounded."
Brett Rowland is an award-winning journalist who has
worked as an editor and reporter in newsrooms in Illinois and Wisconsin.
He is an investigative reporter for The Center Square. |