Explainer-What are the "zombie" war powers Congress may repeal?
Send a link to a friend
[March 29, 2023]
By Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Congress is voting this week on
legislation to repeal the 1991 and 2002 Authorizations for the Use of
Military Force, or AUMFs, against Iraq, lawmakers' latest attempt to
reassert Congress' role in deciding whether to send troops into combat.
Here is what to know about these war authorizations.
WHAT IS AN AUMF?
Under the Constitution, Congress, not the president, has the right to
declare war. But to allow a president to respond to a threat, the Senate
and House of Representatives can pass an AUMF.
The two that may be repealed this year were approved in 1991 after Iraq
invaded Kuwait and in 2002, ahead of the 2003 U.S. invasion that toppled
Saddam Hussein. They have been labeled "zombie" authorizations because
they never expire but their original purpose no longer applies.
Supporters say the AUMFs should be repealed because Iraq is not a U.S.
adversary and because they could pave the way for future destabilizing
military action that has little to do with the original intent of the
authorizations.
Some criticized Republican then-President Donald Trump's use of the 2002
Iraq AUMF for the 2020 killing of senior Iranian military commander
Qassem Soleimani, who was in Iraq but whose targeting was not connected
to the earlier war.
WHAT ABOUT THE 'WAR ON TERROR?'
Members of Congress are not - for now - targeting a third AUMF, which
passed days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The measure authorized
then-President George W. Bush to target al Qaeda for the assault on New
York and Washington.
Because that AUMF also does not expire and was not limited by geography,
it has been used by both Republicans and Democrats to justify military
action around the globe.
[to top of second column]
|
The U.S. Capitol dome is seen in the
morning sun in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 9, 2023. REUTERS/Mary
F. Calvert
But lawmakers said the ongoing campaign against militant violence is
too important to repeal the 2001 authorization before a replacement
is written.
WILL THE REPEAL PASS THIS TIME?Congress has tried and failed to
repeal AUMFs repeatedly over the past 10 years.
Backers say things are different this time, partly because it has
been 20 years since the last Iraq war began, and because Democratic
President Joe Biden, a former senator, has said he supports the
repeal and does not believe it will harm national security.
The measure has both Democratic and Republican co-sponsors in both
the Senate and House. It is expected to easily pass the
Democratic-led Senate after procedural votes were overwhelmingly in
favor.
Its fate in the Republican-led House is less clear, given that
support for AUMF repeals in the past has been much stronger among
Democrats than Republicans.
Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said this month there was a
strong chance the House would pass a bill, but that it must go
through committee review before the full chamber would vote.
That could delay repeal. Representative Michael McCaul, the
Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has said
he does not think the AUMFs should be repealed until a new AUMF has
been written to replace them.
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Don Durfee and Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|