Trump asks federal court to take over NY hush money criminal case
Send a link to a friend
[May 05, 2023]
By Karen Freifeld and Luc Cohen
(Reuters) -Lawyers for Donald Trump on Thursday asked the federal court
in Manhattan to take over a state criminal case charging him with
falsifying business records over a hush money payment to a porn star
before his victory in the 2016 presidential election.
His lawyers argued that the federal court had jurisdiction because the
charges had to do with conduct that took place while he was president.
Trump, who lost the 2020 election to Democratic President Joe Biden, is
currently the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to the
presidency in 2024.
Trump pleaded not guilty in Manhattan state court last month to 34
counts of falsifying business records to conceal reimbursements to his
then-lawyer Michael Cohen for the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels to
stay quiet about an alleged sexual liaison, which Trump denies.
In a federal court filing on Thursday afternoon, Trump's lawyers said
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case was based on checks
allegedly written to Cohen by Trump in 2017, while Trump was president.
They denied that the checks and related records were false records.
"This case is unprecedented in our nation's history," his lawyers wrote.
"Never before has a local elected prosecutor criminally prosecuted a
defendant either for conduct that occurred entirely while the defendant
was the sitting President of the United States or for conduct that
related to federal campaign contribution laws."
A spokesperson for the district attorney said the office was reviewing
the notice and would respond in court.
Prosecutors say Trump falsified records related to reimbursing Cohen in
part to cover up the fact that the payment to Daniels exceeded federal
campaign contribution limits.
Marc Scholl, a former prosecutor in the Manhattan DA's office, said that
while Trump had a chance of success, it was more likely that the case
would be sent back to state court.
"At the end of the day, New York is not trying to prosecute him for a
federal crime or for anything he did in connection with his presidential
duties," Scholl said. "But it's certainly a potential delaying tactic."
[to top of second column]
|
Former U.S. President Donald Trump
delivers remarks on the day of his court appearance in New York
after being indicted by a Manhattan grand jury following a probe
into hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels, in Palm Beach,
Florida, U.S., April 4, 2023. REUTERS/Marco Bello
'BENDING OVER BACKWARDS'
In a hearing in the state case earlier on Thursday, Justice Juan
Merchan in Manhattan ruled Trump will not be able to publicly
discuss evidence obtained by prosecutors and turned over to Trump to
prepare for trial.
Prosecutors said the order was needed to reduce the risk of
harassment against witnesses and others in the case, given Trump's
history of attacks via social media.
Defense attorneys argued that the proposed order is too restrictive
and that Trump has a right to comment on evidence, both to defend
himself and as a presidential candidate. They said prosecutors and
witnesses have attacked Trump as well.
Merchan said Trump would be free to speak about most evidence, just
not that garnered by the prosecution and turned over to him for his
defense in the case.
He said the restrictions he would impose do not apply to the vast
majority of evidence, which comes from the defense.
"I am bending over backwards," the judge said, to see Trump is
"given every opportunity ... to advance his candidacy."
But, Merchan added, "His words, especially when used in the form of
rhetoric, can have consequences."
Merchan also asked Trump's lawyers and prosecutors to see if they
can agree on a trial date in February or March 2024, which would be
in the thick of his campaign for the presidency.
Trump's appearance was waived, so he was not in court. He was in
Doonbeg, Ireland, playing golf on Thursday.
Trump faces a plethora of other legal cases, including a civil case
trial centering on accusations of rape and defamation that continued
in a federal courtroom on Thursday.
(Reporting by Karen Freifeld; Additional reporting by Luc Cohen;
Editing by Jonathan Oatis, Lisa Shumaker and Daniel Wallis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |