Greens sue California over changes to rooftop solar incentives
Send a link to a friend
[May 05, 2023]
By Clark Mindock
(Reuters) -Environmental groups have sued California regulators over new
rules they say will discourage the growth of rooftop solar
installations, in violation of state law.
Three groups filed a petition on Wednesday asking a state court in San
Francisco to review and set aside the California Public Utilities
Commission’s policy changes, which reduce the money credited to rooftop
solar panel owners for sending excess power they generate into the grid.
The reforms were adopted in December after critics including utilities
and ratepayer advocates successfully argued the perk is unfair to those
without panels.
The environmental groups said Wednesday that the policy changes, which
went into effect last month, will “devastate solar adoption rates” in
violation of a 2013 state law requiring the commission to encourage the
growth of rooftop solar in the state. Failing to encourage growth
undermines efforts to meet state climate goals, they said.
The petition filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, the
Environmental Working Group and the Protect Our Communities Foundation
also said the new rules failed to establish a legally required fund to
support solar adoption in disadvantaged communities.
A representative for the Commission said it will respond to the lawsuit
in court and is scheduled to consider rehearing petitions related to the
rules next month.
Solar industry trade groups including the California Solar & Storage
Association have been critical of the rules changes, calling them a
"step backwards" shortly after the Commission voted last year.
Representatives for utilities Southern California Edison Co. and Pacific
Gas and Electric, two of three utilities impacted by the rules, said
they're reviewing the lawsuit but declined to comment Thursday. San
Diego Gas & Electric Co. didn't immediately respond to a request for
comment Thursday.
The state’s old rules for so-called “net metering” compensated customers
at or near the full retail electricity rate when they sent excess power
their solar panels produced to the grid.
[to top of second column]
|
Solar panels from SunPower are installed
on residential buildings at a model home display in the Eureka Grove
neighborhood of Granite Bay, California, U.S., October 5, 2021.
Picture taken with a drone. Picture taken October 5, 2021.
REUTERS/Nathan Frandino
The new rules only apply to newly enrolled solar customers and lower
the compensation to match the rate utilities would have to pay to
buy clean power elsewhere. The groups said the new rules slash
customer credits by up to 80%, though prices vary by utility and
time of day.
According to the petition, the changes came amid a multi-state
campaign by for-profit utilities to "gut" net metering programs by
arguing they shift costs from wealthier solar power owners onto
individuals without the panels. They claim that net metering
unfairly shifts most of the costs associated with electric grid
upkeep to those without solar panels, since solar panel owners have
smaller bills and pay smaller fees as a result.
The environmental groups said those arguments ignore benefits of the
programs, including from reduced greenhouse gas emissions and
increased resiliency from distributed energy production.
The case is Center for Biological Diversity et al. v. Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California, in the Court of
Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, case
number not immediately available.
For the environmental plaintiffs: Ellison Folk and Aaron Stanton of
Shute Mihaly & Weinberger, Caroline Leary of the Environmental
Working Group and Roger Lin, Anchun Jean Su and Howard Crystal of
the Center for Biological Diversity
For the state: counsel not immediately available
(NOTE: Updates with comments from representatives for the Commission
and for two utilities)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |