Under the deal that followed an 18-month federal probe, the Alabama
Department of Public Health (ADPH) agreed to provide basic
sanitation services, end exposure to raw sewage and suspend criminal
penalties against Lowndes County residents who could not afford
septic systems, the Justice Department said.
“Today starts a new chapter for Black residents of Lowndes County,
Alabama who have endured health dangers, indignities and racial
injustice for far too long,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen
Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a
statement.
The federal probe found Alabama health officials knew Black Lowndes
County residents were disproportionately hit by failing septic
systems but took no action to stop raw sewage bubbling out of the
ground into backyards, leading to health impacts like hookworm
intestinal parasites.
In a statement, ADPH denied conducting its sewage or infectious
diseases programs in a discriminatory manner, but said it looked
forward to implementing the settlement to benefit Lowndes County
residents.
Under Title VI of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964, local
governments and other entities that receive federal grants are
prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color or
national origin. The Lowndes County investigation was the first-ever
Title VI environmental justice probe into a Justice Department grant
recipients.
Rural residents of Lowndes County are not connected to municipal
sewage systems. Some have septic tanks while poorer families use
stopgap measures like pipes and ditches to move wastewater.
The median annual household income in Lowndes County, a
predominantly Black area, between 2017 and 2021 was $32,000 compared
with the national median household income of $69,021, according to
U.S. Census Bureau data.
(Reporting By Andrew Hay; editing by Donna Bryson and Leslie Adler)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|