Bank buyers expect sweeteners as US government sets new bar
Send a link to a friend
[May 06, 2023] By
Saeed Azhar, David French and Tatiana Bautzer
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The government-brokered purchases of First
Republic, Signature and Silicon Valley banks have created a vicious
cycle in which troubled lenders need to fail -- and get government
assistance -- before buyers will step up, industry sources say.
The latest case in point: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC)
chose JPMorgan Chase & Co as the winning bidder in an auction to buy
collapsed lender First Republic Bank on Monday.
After First Republic struggled to find a private-sector buyer for weeks,
the FDIC seized it and struck a deal with JPMorgan to take control of
most of its assets. JPMorgan said it would pay $10.6 billion to the
FDIC, while locking in a loss-sharing agreement with the government on
residential mortgages and commercial loans. The FDIC would also provide
JPMorgan $50 billion of financing for five years at an undisclosed fixed
rate as part of the deal.
"After what happened with First Republic, banks don't want to buy any
other bank before the FDIC takes over," said Mayra Rodríguez Valladares,
a financial risk consultant at MRV Associates who trains bankers and
regulators.
"It's cheaper, the stock price goes down and you don't have the natural
problems in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) negotiations that may not end
in a deal."
The phenomenon is stoking fears the current turmoil will accelerate the
concentration of the banking sector in the United States around a
handful of institutions, reducing competition for consumers and
deepening the risk if a giant bank fails.
Silicon Valley Bank, which imploded in March and sparked the ongoing
turmoil in regional banks, was also purchased by First Citizens
BancShares with FDIC help. The purchase drained about $20 billion from
an insurance fund that is financed by banks and run by the government.
The acquisition of the collapsed Signature Bank by New York Community
Bancorp also involved a buyer cherry-picking parts it wanted to take and
leaving unwanted assets, such as Signature's crypto portfolio. The deal
cost the fund $2.5 billion.
After these transactions, publicly-traded buyers are now motivated to
wait for ailing lenders to collapse so they can get better terms from
the FDIC, analysts said.
"For potential acquirers, there is a motivation to wait for a
receivership and FDIC assistance," Christopher Wolfe, head of North
American banks at Fitch Ratings.
FDIC officials, however, say would-be buyers risk losing out if they
allow the value of an acquisition target to deteriorate over time while
waiting for an FDIC receivership.
They also deny mega-banks received special advantages in the recent
failures - major banks could bid for SVB, Signature and First Republic,
and only the last in that line was acquired by a bank considered a
Global Systemically Important Bank, or G-SIB.
When accepting a winning bid in a receivership process, the FDIC must
follow the "least-cost" test, which ensures the regulator accepts the
offer that creates the lowest drag on the Deposit Insurance Fund.
[to top of second column] |
SVB (Silicon Valley Bank) logo is seen
in this illustration taken March 19, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File
Photo
JPMorgan and First Citizens declined to comment. New York Community
Bancorp did not respond to a request for comment.
SWEETENERS
U.S. bank mergers were already sluggish as interest rates rose and
recession loomed, analysts at Raymond James wrote in an Apr. 3 note.
The first quarter was the quietest opening to a year for bank deals
in a generation, they said.
Volatility in regional bank stocks makes it even more difficult to
strike deals. Take Los Angeles-based PacWest Bancorp - its shares
jumped 82% Friday after sinking more than 40% on Thursday over news
the company was exploring options to bolster its finances.
Market volatility stops bank buyers from pulling together enough
money to cover writedowns on struggling assets, which would be
triggered by a traditional acquisition, said David Sandler, co-head
of financial services investment banking at Piper Sandler Companies.
While U.S. authorities were able to offset these requirements in the
three receivership processes, they have also set an expectation that
they will continue to extend sweeteners to buyers to offset
potential losses on undesirable parts of shuttered banks'
portfolios.
And in allowing JPMorgan, the largest U.S. bank, to purchase a
collapsed lender, officials have upended a long-held view that the
government would block banking giants from getting bigger, analysts
and bankers said.
Concerns over whether bank rescues are unintentionally favoring
bigger banks come at a time when spooked depositors have been
pulling their money out of smaller banks and seeking safety in
larger institutions.
Since the global financial crisis in 2008, the banks that were
deemed too big to fail because of their importance to the global
economy have gotten even bigger: JPMorgan's assets ballooned to $3.7
trillion at the end of the first quarter, up from nearly $1.6
trillion at the end of 2007.
Assets at Bank of America Corp, the second-largest U.S. lender, have
swelled to $3.2 trillion at the end of the first quarter, from $1.7
trillion in 2007.
Another benefit of buying through an FDIC receivership is avoiding
the protracted regulatory approval process that other mergers have
faced: Canada's Toronto-Dominion Bank Group on Thursday called off
its $13.4 billion takeover of First Horizon Corp after spending more
than a year trying to secure approval.
Market participants are watching to see if regulators become more
open to consolidation or accelerate takeover approvals, said Jan
Bellens, who heads the global banking and capital markets practice
at EY, an accounting firm.
"I don't think we're at the end of the turmoil yet" for regional
banks, Bellens said. "Investors need to be confident that there's
not going to be further accidents or challenges."
(Reporting by Saeed Azhar, David French and Tatiana Bautzer,
additional reporting by Douglas Gillison in Washington; Editing by
Lananh Nguyen, Michelle Price and Deepa Babington)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |